Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 75 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 75 + 1,241 owner reviews. How we score
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 72–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2074Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 79 Reviews found online 47 67 Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 54
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2179Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 53 70 Ecopia EP150: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.7 = 79
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
48
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 34 – Ecopia EP150: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 48
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
55
Comfort
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +762Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 48 63 Ecopia EP150: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.8 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Noise
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +666Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 50 ≈ 67 (est.) Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 60
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
55
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1469Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 47 63 Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 55
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
50
Handling (owners)
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +1666Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 50 66 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison32Why this score
Source Ecopia EP150 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 32
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 72 |
| Dry | 54 | 74 |
| Wet | 58 | 79 |
| Snow | 48 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | 62 |
| Noise | 60 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 50 | 66 |
| Efficiency | – | 32 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Ecopia EP150
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Ecopia EP150 | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #4/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP150
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
- Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
- Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving
Cons
- Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
- Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
- Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 24 | 86 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 17″ | 14″ – 19″ |
| UTQG | 200 B B | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Sizes in common | 15 | 15 |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 58 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 54 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 66 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 55 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 66 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 62 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology