Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 75 + 46 owner reviews. How we score

Proxes CF1 is ahead, 69–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Toyo Proxes CF1
Tire BToyo

Proxes CF1

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Proxes CF1 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5270

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 57

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Proxes CF1 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5872

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 49

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)–
    Reviews found online35–

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.9 = 49

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    Proxes CF1 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5469

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 61

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Proxes CF1 +4
    62
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5260

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 58

    Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Proxes CF1 +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Proxes CF1
    Reviews found online5569
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Toyo Proxes CF1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Toyo Proxes CF1
Relative Score 59 69
Dry 57 69
Wet 61 72
Snow 49 –
Comfort 61 69
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 58 62
Handling (owners) 55 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Ecopia EP150

Proxes CF1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B Proxes CF1

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
  • Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
  • Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
All owner themes in the Proxes CF1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Toyo Proxes CF1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available24—
Rim diameters13″ – 17″—
UTQG200 B B—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Toyo Proxes CF1

Winner: Toyo Proxes CF1 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes CF1 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Toyo Proxes CF1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 72 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or Proxes CF1?

Toyo Proxes CF1, 62 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology