Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 70–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +1257Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 70 51 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
BluEarth E70: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +1260Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 72 56 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
BluEarth E70: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +1850Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 67 42 Ecopia EP300: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
BluEarth E70: 40% × 63.2 (est.) + 60% × 41.5 = 50
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +862Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 BluEarth E70 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 59 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
BluEarth E70: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth E70. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP300 +1754Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 71 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 58 |
| Dry | 69 | 57 |
| Wet | 72 | 60 |
| Comfort | 68 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
BluEarth E70
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B BluEarth E70
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Predictable handling in dry conditions
- Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 2 | 2 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Yokohama BluEarth E70
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama BluEarth E70 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 50 on comfort.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 54 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 57 on dry.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or BluEarth E70?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or BluEarth E70?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or BluEarth E70?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or BluEarth E70?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 68 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or BluEarth E70?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 70 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology