Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza S-04 Pole Position is ahead, 55–48
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
Potenza S-04 Pole Position +2063Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 30 60 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.2 (est.) + 40% × 30.1 = 43
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
51
Wet
Potenza S-04 Pole Position +657Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 44 52 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 57
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Ecopia EP422 Plus +1736Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online 41 11 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 41 = 53
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 51.8 (est.) + 40% × 11.2 = 36
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
45
Comfort
Potenza S-04 Pole Position +1257Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 34 52 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 61.7 (est.) + 60% × 34.3 = 45
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
56
Noise
Potenza S-04 Pole Position +662Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 40 55 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.3 = 56
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 62
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Level50Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 40 40 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.1 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
34
Handling (owners)
Potenza S-04 Pole Position +2357Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Potenza S-04 Pole Position Reviews found online 34 57
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 55 |
| Dry | 43 | 63 |
| Wet | 51 | 57 |
| Snow | 53 | 36 |
| Comfort | 45 | 57 |
| Noise | 56 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 34 | 57 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Potenza S-04 Pole Position
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B Potenza S-04 Pole Position
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet handling with predictable, repeatable limits
- Solid sidewall design that improves cornering and braking performance
- Surprisingly smooth and comfortable ride quality for a performance tire
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear, which is typical for tires in this category
- Complete lack of usability in freezing temperatures, ice, or snow
- Development of a road humming noise as the tire wears
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 280 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position scores 57 vs 34 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position scores 63 vs 43 on dry.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 53 vs 36 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position scores 57 vs 45 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position, 57 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position, 63 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 53 vs 36 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position, 62 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position, 57 vs 45 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Potenza S-04 Pole Position?
Neither, by our numbers: 50 vs 50 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology