Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 10 + 453 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 74–58

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
± 6

Tests 79 · 3 tests Owners 70 · 453 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Potenza RE 71RS +21
    84
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 65 (est.)78
    Reviews found online6092

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 91.6 = 84

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Potenza RE 71RS +20
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 61 (est.)85
    Reviews found online5267

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 57

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.7 = 77

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 36

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 52 (est.)–
    Reviews found online11–

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 51.8 (est.) + 40% × 11.2 = 36

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Potenza RE 71RS +3
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)71
    Reviews found online5252

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 51.8 = 57

    Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71 + 60% × 52.3 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Potenza RE 71RS +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online5563

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 62

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 63.4 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE 71RS +8
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4052

    Potenza S-04 Pole Position: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.1 = 50

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S-04 Pole Position. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE 71RS +29
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RS
    Reviews found online5786
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position vs Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole PositionBridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Relative Score 58 74
Dry 63 84
Wet 57 77
Snow 36 –
Comfort 57 60
Noise 62 65
Treadwear 50 58
Handling (owners) 57 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza S-04 Pole Position

± 6

Potenza RE 71RS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza S-04 Pole PositionPotenza RE 71RSΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test #1/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S-04 Pole Position

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet handling with predictable, repeatable limits
  • Solid sidewall design that improves cornering and braking performance
  • Surprisingly smooth and comfortable ride quality for a performance tire

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear, which is typical for tires in this category
  • Complete lack of usability in freezing temperatures, ice, or snow
  • Development of a road humming noise as the tire wears
All owner themes in the Potenza S-04 Pole Position review

Tire B Potenza RE 71RS

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
  • Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
  • Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
  • Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
All owner themes in the Potenza RE 71RS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.

Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—10
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″7/32″
UTQG280 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 86 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 84 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 58 vs 50 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S-04 Pole Position
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 84 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 65 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 60 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S-04 Pole Position or Potenza RE 71RS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 58 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology