Tests – · none yet Owners 38 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus vs Hankook Optimo H426 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 24 owner reviews. How we score
Optimo H426 leads, 50–48 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 40 · 24 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
43
Dry
Optimo H426 +851Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 52 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 30 42 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 52.3 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 43
Optimo H426: 60% × 57.1 (est.) + 40% × 41.6 = 51
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
51
Wet
Optimo H426 +354Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 44 48 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 55.9 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51
Optimo H426: 60% × 58.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 54
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
Ecopia EP422 Plus +449Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 41 35 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
Optimo H426: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 34.8 = 49
No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
45
Comfort
Ecopia EP422 Plus +342Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 34 30 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.4 = 45
Optimo H426: 40% × 60.9 (est.) + 60% × 30.1 = 42
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
56
Noise
Optimo H426 +460Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 41 51 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.5 = 56
Optimo H426: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60
No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Ecopia EP422 Plus +347Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 40 35 Ecopia EP422 Plus: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50
Optimo H426: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 35.2 = 47
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Optimo H426. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
34
Handling (owners)
Optimo H426 +135Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Plus Optimo H426 Reviews found online 34 35
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 48 | 50 |
| Dry | 43 | 51 |
| Wet | 51 | 54 |
| Snow | 53 | 49 |
| Comfort | 45 | 42 |
| Noise | 56 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 47 |
| Handling (owners) | 34 | 35 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422 Plus
Optimo H426
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality when new
- Predictable dry and wet traction for conservative daily commuting
Cons
- Significantly shorter tread life than advertised or expected
- Develops loud whining, buzzing, and increased noise as the tread wears down
- Stiff ride quality or harshness over rough pavement and cracks
Tire B Optimo H426
Pros
- Reliable dry and wet traction in moderate weather
- Comfortable and smooth initial ride quality
- Confident handling and cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear in the latter half of the tire's life span
- Subpar performance and loss of grip in cold temperatures or snow
- Increased road noise as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus | B · Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 15 | 11 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 70,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus
Hankook Optimo H426
Narrow edge: Hankook Optimo H426 — better dry, noise and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus if snow, comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 51 vs 43 on dry.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 53 vs 49 on snow.
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 60 vs 56 on noise.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus scores 45 vs 42 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Hankook Optimo H426, 54 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Hankook Optimo H426, 51 vs 43 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 53 vs 49 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Hankook Optimo H426, 60 vs 56 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 45 vs 42 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 Plus or Optimo H426?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 Plus, 50 vs 47 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology