Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 15 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

P ZERO Asimmetrico is ahead, 66–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    P ZERO Asimmetrico +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4870

    Ecopia EP422: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 55

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 70.3 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    P ZERO Asimmetrico +13
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online5371

    Ecopia EP422: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 53 = 58

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    P ZERO Asimmetrico +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4549

    Ecopia EP422: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 58

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 53

    Comfort

    P ZERO Asimmetrico +10
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4561

    Ecopia EP422: 40% × 64 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 63

    Noise

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5757

    Ecopia EP422: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 63

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 63

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 60

    Treadwear

    P ZERO Asimmetrico +4
    64
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5663

    Ecopia EP422: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60

    P ZERO Asimmetrico: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP422. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for P ZERO Asimmetrico. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP422P ZERO Asimmetrico
    Reviews found online–66
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP422Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico
Relative Score 57 66
Dry 55 69
Wet 58 71
Snow 55 58
Comfort 53 63
Noise 63 63
Treadwear 60 64
Handling (owners) – 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP422

± 8

P ZERO Asimmetrico

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP422

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B P ZERO Asimmetrico

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity, with multiple users reporting upwards of 35,000 to 43,000 miles
  • Strong dry grip and excellent road feel when fresh
  • Reliable and competent performance in wet conditions at moderate speeds

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages, often resembling failing wheel bearings
  • Prone to uneven wear and tracking road imperfections
  • Reduced wet traction and potential for wheel spin when pushed before building heat
All owner themes in the P ZERO Asimmetrico review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 B · Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico
CategoryAll-Season tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available617
Rim diameters15″ – 17″17″ – 19″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG480 A A140 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP422

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico

Winner: Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico — better dry, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 15 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico scores 69 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico scores 71 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico scores 63 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Tire B · Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico, 71 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico, 58 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico, 63 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP422 or P ZERO Asimmetrico?

Pirelli P ZERO Asimmetrico, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology