Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 41 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Dynapro HP RA23 leads, 69–65 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Dynapro HP RA23 +770Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 71 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 70
No road tests of dry for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Dynapro HP RA23 +471Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 71 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67
Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
No road tests of wet for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus +365Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 66 61 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68
Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 65
No road tests of snow for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Dynapro HP RA23 +971Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 58 72 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.3 = 62
Dynapro HP RA23: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Dynapro HP RA23 +266Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 66 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66
No road tests of noise for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Dynapro HP RA23 +970Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 72 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Dynapro HP RA23: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP RA23. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison71Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Dynapro HP RA23 Reviews found online – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 69 |
| Dry | 63 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 71 |
| Snow | 68 | 65 |
| Comfort | 62 | 71 |
| Noise | 64 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Dynapro HP RA23
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Pros
- Excellent snow traction, including deep snow, steep grades and heavy-snowfall regions (Maine, Vermont, New England, upstate NY, Colorado/Utah, 400 inches annually at 9,000 ft)
- Good ice performance and strong driver confidence and safety in winter storms
- Quiet ride and stable dry-road behavior, including at high speed, with several reviewers noting low road noise
Cons
- Some reviewers consider it pricey, with one saying it 'cost an arm and a leg'
- Reduced fuel economy was reported
- Dry and wet handling and braking are less sharp than all-season tires, with a 'squishy' feel noted
Tire B Dynapro HP RA23
Pros
- Exceptional tread wear and long lifespan
- Whisper-quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good overall grip and braking in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Potential for sudden understeer in wet conditions during aggressive cornering
- Mixed feedback regarding ride comfort from a small subset of users
- Limited ice traction compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | B · Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 19 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23
Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus if snow matters most to you. Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 71 vs 62 on comfort.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 70 vs 61 on treadwear.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 70 vs 63 on dry.
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23 scores 71 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus, 68 vs 65 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 71 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Dynapro HP RA23?
Hankook Dynapro HP RA23, 70 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology