Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 41 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus vs Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 41 + 171 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G91AV is ahead, 73–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 171 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Geolandar G91AV +1376Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 60 81 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 63
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.7 = 76
No road tests of dry for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Geolandar G91AV +572Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72
No road tests of wet for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
Geolandar G91AV +472Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 66 74 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72
No road tests of snow for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Geolandar G91AV +1375Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 58 79 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58.2 = 62
Geolandar G91AV: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 78.7 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Noise
Geolandar G91AV +670Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 74 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
No road tests of noise for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Treadwear
Geolandar G91AV +1374Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 58 79 Ecopia H/L 422 Plus: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
Geolandar G91AV: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia H/L 422 Plus. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G91AV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison81Why this score
Source Ecopia H/L 422 Plus Geolandar G91AV Reviews found online – 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 73 |
| Dry | 63 | 76 |
| Wet | 67 | 72 |
| Snow | 68 | 72 |
| Comfort | 62 | 75 |
| Noise | 64 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Geolandar G91AV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Geolandar G91AV
Pros
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on highways and city streets
- Reliable traction and confident handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good overall durability and tread longevity for daily commuting
Cons
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or lateral sliding during aggressive cornering in heavy rain
- Some complaints regarding premature tread wear and lack of manufacturer warranty support
- Subpar dry traction and wheel-spin reported by select Forester owners
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus | B · Yokohama Geolandar G91AV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 19 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 17″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 600 A A | 280 B A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia H/L 422 Plus
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G91AV — better dry, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 76 vs 63 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 75 vs 62 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 74 vs 61 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV scores 70 vs 64 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 76 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 72 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 70 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 75 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia H/L 422 Plus or Geolandar G91AV?
Yokohama Geolandar G91AV, 74 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology