Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 70 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 7 in 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 21 road tests and 3 + 12,714 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–72
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 70 · 3 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 7 in 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,714 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)
“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 20 tests | 80 | 89 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 84 |
Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 73.4 = 77
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 20 tests | 74 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 72 | 84 |
Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 72.3 = 73
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 6 tests | 72 | 82 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 72 |
Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 40% × 71.9 + 60% × 62.2 = 66
Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 13 tests | 71 | 73 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for Potenza Adrenalin RE005 or Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 78 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 60 |
Potenza Adrenalin RE005: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Adrenalin RE005. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 74 | 81 |
| Source | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests | – | 76 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 82 |
| Dry | 77 | 87 |
| Wet | 73 | 89 |
| Comfort | 66 | 76 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza Adrenalin RE005
Pilot Sport 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | Pilot Sport 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #4/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 97% #2/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 90% #2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #6/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 97% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 70% #5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #3/7 · 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | 99% #6/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2026 AutoView Sport Tyre Test | #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.
“I ran the stock 17" Ecopia's on my Ecosport for about 45k km. Luckily didn't face any side wall cuts. Overall it was a average tyre with decent grip levels - good grip without any squealing when driving up a ghat road quite enthusiastically even at the fag end of it's life. Ride quality was pretty bad and the smallest of ruts would result in a thud and being low profile amplified it even more. The tyres developed these cracks along the shoulder around the 35-40k mark which should not have happened due to which I changed them at 45k even though there was probably enough thread for about 5-10k km more. Moved to the Michelin PS4 now and the difference is night and day!”
“Quote: Originally Posted by ua549 In over 55 years of driving I've never gotten more than 20k miles on a set of tires. Michelin Pilot Sport is the worst at 6k miles twice in a row with free factory replacements though I've gotten 18k miles on Michelin AS3 tires once or twice. Dunlop Sport is second at 15k miles. Overall Pirelli Cinturato P7 are the longest wearing tires I've owned over the years at 20k miles consistently. I swap out run flat tires if they come on a new car. I believe that heat is a major cause of tire wear. Even after a 2 mile trip @ 35 mph the tires on my E300 register about 120°F. Cold they are between 80°F and 85°F. In the dead of winter they are 5° colder. The OEM tires on my 5 year old '18 E300 got 12k miles. The car has 20k miles on it now and the P7 tires are about 40% worn. My experience with Summer tires is 15 to 18k max. The only Summer tires that I have owned that lasted more than 20 were the Pilot Sport PS4...which BTW is one of their marketing highlights, longer tread wear...though still shorter than all seasons which normally are rated for 30k or more.”
“The Pilot Sport 4's are great tires for dual duty use. You'll want to keep hot pressures below 37-38 PSI. Anything above that they get very greasy, very fast. In the cars I've driven with them (a few BMW M cars, a 911 I think if I remember), you'll usually set your best laps in the first 4-5 laps of a session depending on temps. Once they over heat heat, as with any street tire, you have to park them for an hour to get the temps down again (downside to steel radials). I'd also recommend Hankook RS4s if you want a more durable track tire. That's what I run. Very long lasting, but not as great in the wet as the PS4s would be. Road noise would also be an issue for street use.”
Based on 246 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 62 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 - 320 A - AA A |
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE005 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 73 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 87 vs 77 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 66 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 74 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 73 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 77 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 66 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 66 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology