Tests – · none yet Owners 76 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza GIII vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza GIII leads, 75–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Potenza GIII +671Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 82 73 Potenza GIII: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 77
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Potenza GIII. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
Potenza GIII +275Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 80 76 Potenza GIII: 60% × 75.8 (est.) + 40% × 80 = 77
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Potenza GIII. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +774Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 76 Potenza GIII: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.8 = 67
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Potenza GIII. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 67 Potenza GIII: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 67
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza GIII. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
81
Handling (owners)
Potenza GIII +477Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 81 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza GIII | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 72 |
| Dry | 77 | 71 |
| Wet | 77 | 75 |
| Comfort | 67 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 81 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza GIII
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza GIII
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip with great road feedback and minimal squealing at the limit
- Reliable and confident wet-weather performance
- Good tread longevity and durability over high mileage
Cons
- Can be noisy during family trips or extended highway driving
- Performance in wet conditions can occasionally be perceived as average compared to its stellar dry performance
- Sensitive to precise tire pressure adjustments to achieve optimal comfort and performance
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza GIII | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 180 A A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza GIII
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza GIII — better dry. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza GIII rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 74 vs 67 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza GIII scores 77 vs 71 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza GIII or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza GIII or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 75 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza GIII or BluEarth Es ES32?
Bridgestone Potenza GIII, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza GIII or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza GIII or BluEarth Es ES32?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology