Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza GIII vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Potenza GIII leads, 72–70 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
Potenza GIII +769Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 80 70 -
74
Wet
Potenza GIII +272Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 76 73 -
67
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +572Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 65 74 -
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 65 65 -
79
Handling
Potenza GIII +673Why this score
Source Potenza GIII BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 79 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza GIII | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 70 |
| Dry | 76 | 69 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling | 79 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza GIII
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza GIII
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip with great road feedback and minimal squealing at the limit
- Reliable and confident wet-weather performance
- Good tread longevity and durability over high mileage
Cons
- Can be noisy during family trips or extended highway driving
- Performance in wet conditions can occasionally be perceived as average compared to its stellar dry performance
- Sensitive to precise tire pressure adjustments to achieve optimal comfort and performance
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza GIII | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 64 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza GIII
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza GIII — better dry and handling. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza GIII scores 76 vs 69 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza GIII scores 79 vs 73 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.