Tests – · 1 test Owners 47 · 23 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 23 + 2,182 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza RE-71R 56, Potenza RE050A 57.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 2,182 reviews
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
71
Dry
Potenza RE-71R +1061Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 73 57 Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
61
Wet
Potenza RE-71R +259Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 57 54 Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
46
Snow
Potenza RE050A +1157Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 30 48 Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.7 = 46
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 48 = 57
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
47
Comfort
Potenza RE050A +148Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 37 38 Potenza RE-71R: 40% × 62.2 (est.) + 60% × 36.6 = 47
Potenza RE050A: 40% × 62.5 (est.) + 60% × 38.1 = 48
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE-71R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Potenza RE050A +262Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 50 55 Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 60
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
31
Treadwear
Potenza RE050A +2051Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 39 ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 19 41 Potenza RE-71R: 60% × 39.3 + 40% × 18.6 = 31
Potenza RE050A: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 51
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE-71R +1354Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R Potenza RE050A Reviews found online 67 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 57 |
| Dry | 71 | 61 |
| Wet | 61 | 59 |
| Snow | 46 | 57 |
| Comfort | 47 | 48 |
| Noise | 60 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 31 | 51 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE-71R
Potenza RE050A
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza RE-71R | Potenza RE050A | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #13/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #3/8 2015 Australian Motor 235/35 R19 Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE-71R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and exceptional cornering traction
- Fast heat-up times, making them ideal for autocross and time attacks
- Consistent performance throughout the lifespan of the tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan, wearing faster in hot weather or heavy track use
- Noticeable road noise on the highway due to the aggressive tread pattern
- Uncomfortable and stiff ride quality for daily driving
Tire B Potenza RE050A
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
- Precise steering response and sharp turn-in feedback
- Stiff sidewalls that enhance sporty handling and provide rim protection
Cons
- Harsh ride quality and stiff impact absorption, especially over rough roads and potholes
- Noticeable and escalating road noise as the tires wear
- Mediocre performance and reduced traction in cold temperatures or wintry conditions
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is largely mixed, with drivers acknowledging solid dry grip, responsive handling, and decent wet traction when warm. However, many owners criticize the tire's harsh ride quality, high road noise, fast treadwear, high replacement cost, and complete lack of traction in cold or snowy conditions. Run-flat variants are particularly disliked for their stiff ride and difficulty of repair.
“So here's whats on my car, and how I got here (2011 335d m-sport): Rear: RE 050 A, no designation of I or II, so I'm thinking they were first gen. The BMW dealership put them on the car at about 18k. Front: Original OEM from the factory RE 050 A I. I'm about to have these two replaced tomorrow after a major alignment issue has worn both outside front edges, although the car tracks straight... we'll see what i end up with tomorrow!”
“Got my Camelot rims mounted with Bridgestone Potenza Re050a tires!”
“Re050a is more of a semi racing stickies. It's more in line with the potenza race. Any of the popular sport tires i.e pilot sport or potenza sport will do. For me. I'd go for Toyo Proxes sport 2.”
Based on 76 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 37 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 140 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R and Bridgestone Potenza RE050A are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R is stronger on handling and dry. Bridgestone Potenza RE050A is stronger on treadwear and snow.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A scores 51 vs 31 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 67 vs 54 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A scores 57 vs 46 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 71 vs 61 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 59 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R, 71 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 57 vs 46 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Neither, by our numbers: 47 vs 48 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE-71R or Potenza RE050A?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A, 51 vs 31 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology