Tests – · 1 test Owners 56 · 23 reviews
Best test result: #13 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (overall ranking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 66–59
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Potenza RE-71R +174Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – 77 Reviews found online 79 69 -
64
Wet
ADVAN Fleva V701 +468Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – 70 Reviews found online 63 65 -
48
Snow
Potenza RE-71R +1236Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 33 14 -
58
Comfort
ADVAN Fleva V701 +563Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – 62 Reviews found online 47 64 -
62
Noise
ADVAN Fleva V701 +769Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online 54 61 -
35
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +3469Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) 38 74 Reviews found online 31 61 Tested Tread Life (Miles) (% of best) · 1 shared test 39% 85% -
73
Handling
Potenza RE-71R +271Why this score
Source Potenza RE-71R ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 73 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 66 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 64 | 68 |
| Snow | 48 | 36 |
| Comfort | 58 | 63 |
| Noise | 62 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 35 | 69 |
| Handling | 73 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
59
/ 100
Potenza RE-71R
66
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza RE-71R | ADVAN Fleva V701 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #13/22 | #6/22 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires |
| Tested Tread Life (Miles) | Treadwear | 39% | 85% | −46.1 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE-71R
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and exceptional cornering traction
- Fast heat-up times, making them ideal for autocross and time attacks
- Consistent performance throughout the lifespan of the tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan, wearing faster in hot weather or heavy track use
- Noticeable road noise on the highway due to the aggressive tread pattern
- Uncomfortable and stiff ride quality for daily driving
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Neutral
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
fiestastforum.com
·2022-11-30
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
59
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
66
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better treadwear, noise and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 35 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R scores 48 vs 36 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 62 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.