Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama A008P — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 0 road tests and 453 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 74–67

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
± 6

Tests 79 · 3 tests Owners 69 · 453 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”

Yokohama A008P
Tire BYokohama

A008P

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 61 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 84

    Dry

    Potenza RE 71RS +13
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online9272

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 91.5 = 84

    A008P: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 71

    No road tests of dry for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Potenza RE 71RS +11
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests85≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 66.7 = 77

    A008P: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–37

    A008P: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 36.9 = 51

    No road tests of snow for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    A008P +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5271

    Potenza RE 71RS: 40% × 71 + 60% × 52.3 = 60

    A008P: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 71.1 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 65

    Noise

    Potenza RE 71RS +3
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6355

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 63.2 = 65

    A008P: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 62

    No road tests of noise for A008P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    A008P +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5258

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 58

    A008P: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for A008P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 86

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE 71RS +15
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA008P
    Reviews found online8671
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama A008P: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE 71RSYokohama A008P
Relative Score 74 67
Dry 84 71
Wet 77 66
Snow – 51
Comfort 60 70
Noise 65 62
Treadwear 58 61
Handling (owners) 86 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

Potenza RE 71RS

± 8

A008P

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE 71RS

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
  • Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
  • Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
  • Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
All owner themes in the Potenza RE 71RS review

Tire B A008P

Pros

  • Exceptional handling and high-speed stability, with one reviewer saying the tires could go faster than the car allowed
  • Quiet operation, noted by a a retailer reviewer
  • Strong driver confidence and road feel, with one owner saying they carried more speed through corners

Cons

  • Difficulty balancing, reported by two reviewers
  • Road force balancing revealed tires out of spec, including one that could not be balanced and two that were way out of spec in another set
  • Vibration and shaking persisted after standard balancing attempts and suspension component changes
All owner themes in the A008P review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.

Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama A008P

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS B · Yokohama A008P
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available103
Rim diameters15″ – 19″16″
Tread depth7/32″9/32″
UTQG200 A A240 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Yokohama A008P

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama A008P if comfort and treadwear matter most to you. Yokohama A008P rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 86 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 84 vs 71 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A008P scores 70 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Tire B · Yokohama A008P

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 84 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 65 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Yokohama A008P, 70 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE 71RS or A008P?

Yokohama A008P, 61 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology