Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama A.Drive — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 452 + 28 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE 71RS is ahead, 75–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 452 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (subj. wet handling)

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”

Yokohama A.Drive
Tire BYokohama

A.Drive

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 28 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 81

    Dry

    Potenza RE 71RS +20
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests76≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online8958

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 89.2 = 81

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.7 = 61

    No road tests of dry for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    Potenza RE 71RS +15
    62
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests84≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6859

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 67.7 = 77

    A.Drive: 60% × 63.5 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 65

    Comfort

    Potenza RE 71RS +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5658

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 56.1 = 65

    A.Drive: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.2 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for A.Drive. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests67–
    Reviews found online64–

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 64.2 = 66

  5. 61

    Treadwear

    A.Drive +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5964

    Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61

    A.Drive: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for A.Drive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 84

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE 71RS +25
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE 71RSA.Drive
    Reviews found online8459
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS vs Yokohama A.Drive: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE 71RSYokohama A.Drive
Relative Score 75 62
Dry 81 61
Wet 77 62
Comfort 65 64
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 61 65
Handling (owners) 84 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE 71RS

A.Drive

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE 71RS

Pros

  • Outstanding dry grip and rapid warm-up characteristics.
  • Highly predictable and communicative at the limit, allowing for easy recovery.
  • Improved on-road refinement, noise levels, and comfort compared to its predecessor.

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear, especially when used aggressively on track or heavy vehicles.
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose peak grip during extended track sessions.
  • Stiff sidewalls can make mounting the tires onto rims difficult.
All owner themes in the Potenza RE 71RS review

Tire B A.Drive

Pros

  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Reliable and predictable grip in dry road conditions
  • Solid durability and tread life for many users

Cons

  • Significant issues with wet-weather traction and aquaplaning
  • High levels of road noise, particularly at highway speeds
  • Inconsistent tread wear performance across different driving styles
All owner themes in the A.Drive review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Positive

Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.

r/MechanicAdvice ·1 upvote ·2021-08-02

“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”

r/GR86 ·256 upvotes ·2026-09-23

“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”

civicx.com ·2025-02-25

“They are an amazing tire, both for autocross and track days. I'm currently running Falkens but my next track set will be RE71s for sure. Should be able to get a half second off my laps from what I've seen so far.”

Top themes
#track and autocross performance#tire pressure tuning#road noise and refinement#clearance pricing and availability#fitment and sizing#tread wear and longevity#comparison to previous RE-71R

Based on 33 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama A.Drive

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS B · Yokohama A.Drive
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available10—
Rim diameters15″ – 19″—
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS

Yokohama A.Drive

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Yokohama A.Drive if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 84 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 81 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama A.Drive scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Tire B · Yokohama A.Drive

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE 71RS or A.Drive?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE 71RS or A.Drive?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE 71RS or A.Drive?

Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 81 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE 71RS or A.Drive?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE 71RS or A.Drive?

Yokohama A.Drive, 65 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology