Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 452 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza RE 71RS leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 71 · 452 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test (subj. wet handling)
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 89 | 80 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 89.2 = 81
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 84 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 69 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 67.7 = 77
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 61 |
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 67 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 56.1 = 65
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 67 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 68 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 66.6 + 40% × 64.2 = 66
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 61 |
Potenza RE 71RS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.5 = 61
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE 71RS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 84 | 79 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 70 |
| Dry | 81 | 75 |
| Wet | 77 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 65 |
| Comfort | 65 | 68 |
| Noise | 66 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 84 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE 71RS
Advan Neova AD08
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza RE 71RS | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/7 2025 Tire Rack Extreme Performance Track Tyre Test | #4/10 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Bridgestone Potenza RE-71RS is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising its high grip levels, responsive turn-in, and improved refinement over the older RE-71R. Discussions frequently center around track and autocross setups, optimal hot tire pressures, clearance pricing, and its streetability regarding road noise and gravel pickup. Minor caveats noted include fast wear characteristic of 200tw competition tires and rotation limits stemming from an asymmetrical tread design.
“Mileage-expectancy of Bridgestone Potenza RE-71Rs? (200-rated, I think?) Forgive me I'm getting the terminology wrong, but I just bought a super dynamite NA Miata that has had a TON of incredible suspension work (mostly Flyin' Miata stuff) and the stickiest tires I have ever experienced by FAR: Potenza RE-71Rs. (Forget full measurements but they're on 15 x 7.5" inch wheels, 6UL's by 949 Racing.) And I think their life is pretty much over. I love them but I don't want to track the car; I want to drive it two hours into the country every other weekend. I want to drive through the mountains with great . . . spiritedness . . . but I don't need track-focused tires. I'd much rather have something slightly less grippy in exchange for longer tread life. The previous owner (who I've stayed in touch with) recommenced I get "300-rated" tires instead of "200-rated" tires. I don't really know what that means or how many miles I can expect from such a tire. I'm contemplating getting the Continental Extreme Contacts, but I just don't know enough about tires to know what they're like or how much ACTUAL mileage I can get----I also dont' understand 200 vs. 300 tires. Please help?”
“Drove my GR86 coast to coast on pre-thrashed 200tw tires in 3.5 days AMA 2024 GR86 Premium performance package mt Bridgestone Potenza RE-71rs tires Car had 24,000ish miles and now has 27,000ish”
“They are an amazing tire, both for autocross and track days. I'm currently running Falkens but my next track set will be RE71s for sure. Should be able to get a half second off my laps from what I've seen so far.”
Based on 33 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 if comfort matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 77 vs 69 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS scores 81 vs 75 on dry.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.
Bridgestone Potenza RE 71RS, 81 vs 75 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
