Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 42 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Potenza RE001 is ahead, 66–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Potenza RE001 +1455Why this score
Source Potenza RE001 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 70 48 -
67
Wet
Potenza RE001 +1057Why this score
Source Potenza RE001 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 66 53 -
62
Comfort
Potenza RE001 +854Why this score
Source Potenza RE001 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 56 38 -
62
Treadwear
Bluearth E51 +264Why this score
Source Potenza RE001 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 59 63 -
68
Handling
Potenza RE001 +2345Why this score
Source Potenza RE001 Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 68 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE001 | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 56 |
| Dry | 69 | 55 |
| Wet | 67 | 57 |
| Comfort | 62 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 64 |
| Handling | 68 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE001
Bluearth E51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE001
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and steering feedback
- High value-for-money proposition
- Progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- High levels of road noise on coarse surfaces
- Stiff, harsh ride quality
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
Tire B Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001 | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE001
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE001 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 68 vs 45 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 67 vs 57 on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 62 vs 54 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.