Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 20 + 42 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ventus S1 evo2 SUV and Potenza RE001 are level at 66.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 42 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 69 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 61.9 = 68
Potenza RE001: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 65 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 65.4 = 72
Potenza RE001: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 53 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.8 = 61
Potenza RE001: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 57 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
Potenza RE001: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 68 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Bridgestone Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 72 | 67 |
| Comfort | 61 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Potenza RE001
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 38 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | — |
| UTQG | 220 - 420 A - AA A | — |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Bridgestone Potenza RE001
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV and Bridgestone Potenza RE001 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is stronger on wet and comfort. Bridgestone Potenza RE001 is stronger on handling and treadwear.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 68 vs 61 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 61 vs 55 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 72 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 61 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 61 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Bridgestone Potenza RE001, 61 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology