Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 20 + 562 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV is ahead, 66–55
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 58 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 562 reviews
“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 54 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 61.9 = 68
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54 = 59
No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 57 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 65.3 = 72
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 60
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 57 |
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 63
No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 57 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 66.3 (est.) + 60% × 56.8 = 61
CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.3 = 61
No road tests of comfort for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 61 |
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | ≈ 51 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 23 |
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 50.9 (est.) + 40% × 22.9 = 40
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 46 |
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 55 |
| Dry | 68 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 60 |
| Snow | – | 63 |
| Comfort | 61 | 61 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 40 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
CrossContact LX Sport
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Community sentiment regarding the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with drivers frequently noting it as a standard factory OEM equipment on various SUVs and EVs. While some owners praise its low road noise, comfort, and solid dry handling, others criticize it for poor wet traction, quick tread wear, and issues like flaking or chunking. Many drivers consider replacing them with alternatives from Michelin, Pirelli, or EV-specific options once worn.
“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”
“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”
“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”
Based on 27 community posts
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 38 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 220 - 420 A - AA A | 480 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 17 | 17 |
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Winner: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 55 vs 40 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 61 vs 46 on handling.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 72 vs 60 on wet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 72 vs 60 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 68 vs 59 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 55 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology