Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 2 road tests and 6 + 20 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV leads, 66–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 2 tests Owners 59 · 20 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
63
Dry
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +669Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 60 73 Reviews found online 67 62 N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 59.7 + 40% × 67.4 = 63
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 62.4 = 69
-
70
Wet
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +272Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 2 tests 75 77 Reviews found online 64 66 N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 75 + 40% × 63.6 = 70
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 65.6 = 72
-
60
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.7 = 60
No road tests of snow for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
55
Comfort
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +661Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 48 57 N'Fera SUR4G: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 47.7 = 55
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 63 – N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 65
No road tests of noise for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
48
Treadwear
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV +755Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 36 47 N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.3 = 48
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
64
Handling (owners)
N'Fera SUR4G +361Why this score
Source N'Fera SUR4G Ventus S1 evo2 SUV Reviews found online 64 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Nexen N'Fera SUR4G | Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 66 |
| Dry | 63 | 69 |
| Wet | 70 | 72 |
| Snow | 60 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | 61 |
| Noise | 65 | – |
| Treadwear | 48 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
N'Fera SUR4G
Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | N'Fera SUR4G | Ventus S1 evo2 SUV | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | 99% #4/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #2/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2017 Auto Bild Summer SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/3 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | #6/8 2019 Auto Express SUV Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A N'Fera SUR4G
Pros
- Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
- Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
- Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
- Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
Tire B Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with strong confidence-inspiring handling
- High value for money compared to premium Tier-1 brand alternatives
- Good ride comfort and low road noise for highway cruising
Cons
- Premature outer block and edge wear, particularly on front axles
- Poor performance in snow and ice, typical of summer tires
- Limited off-road capability
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Nexen N'Fera SUR4G | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 20″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 200 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Where the Nexen N'Fera SUR4G is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Nexen N'Fera SUR4G rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 55 vs 48 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 69 vs 63 on dry.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV scores 61 vs 55 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 69 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 61 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, N'Fera SUR4G or Ventus S1 evo2 SUV?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo2 SUV, 55 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology