Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 40 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 72–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 40 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1574Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 ContiMaxContact MC6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 55 77 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1672Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 ContiMaxContact MC6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 51 73 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1470Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 ContiMaxContact MC6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 70 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +265Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 ContiMaxContact MC6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 69 64 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +2776Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 ContiMaxContact MC6 Reviews found online 49 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 72 |
| Dry | 59 | 74 |
| Wet | 56 | 72 |
| Comfort | 56 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE030
ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 3 |
| Rim diameters | — | 19″ – 21″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 49 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 56 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 72 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 70 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or ContiMaxContact MC6?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology