Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Dunlop SP Touring R1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 22 owner reviews. How we score
SP Touring R1 is ahead, 69–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 22 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
SP Touring R1 +1069Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 SP Touring R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 55 70 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
SP Touring R1 +1470Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 SP Touring R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 71 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
SP Touring R1: 60% × 70.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
SP Touring R1 +1268Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 SP Touring R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 43 67 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
SP Touring R1: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.8 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 SP Touring R1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
SP Touring R1: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring R1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
SP Touring R1 +2271Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 SP Touring R1 Reviews found online 49 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Dunlop SP Touring R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 69 |
| Dry | 59 | 69 |
| Wet | 56 | 70 |
| Comfort | 56 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE030
SP Touring R1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B SP Touring R1
Pros
- High tread longevity and durability
- Excellent value for money
- Comfortable and quiet ride quality
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance
- Reports of sidewall vulnerability
- Occasional road noise feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Dunlop SP Touring R1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Dunlop SP Touring R1
Winner: Dunlop SP Touring R1 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 71 vs 49 on handling.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 70 vs 56 on wet.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 68 vs 56 on comfort.
Dunlop SP Touring R1 scores 69 vs 59 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 70 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1?
Dunlop SP Touring R1, 68 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or SP Touring R1?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology