tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 8 + 2,840 owner reviews. How we score

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 74–58

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 or Potenza RE030 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Tire BGoodyear

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Summer

Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 66 · 2,840 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)

“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 63 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5576

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75 + 40% × 75.5 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +22
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 59 (est.)80
    Reviews found online5176

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.1 + 40% × 75.9 = 78

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 58 (est.)
    Reviews found online–33

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.6 (est.) + 40% × 32.8 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +19
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)79
    Reviews found online4371

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 78.7 + 40% × 70.7 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–70
    Reviews found online–69

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 68.8 = 69

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE030 +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6962

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 +25
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
    Reviews found online4974
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE030Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Relative Score 58 74
Dry 59 75
Wet 56 78
Snow – 48
Comfort 56 75
Noise – 69
Treadwear 67 64
Handling (owners) 49 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE030

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction and braking performance
  • Superior ride comfort and significantly reduced road noise compared to competitors or run-flats
  • Predictable and progressive handling limits

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on high-powered or rear-wheel-drive vehicles
  • Softer sidewalls can induce a 'spongy' or 'jelly-like' feel during sharp, high-speed direction changes
  • Susceptible to sidewall bulging or cracking when encountering harsh potholes, especially in run-flat variants
All owner themes in the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Positive

Community sentiment for the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is predominantly positive, with drivers praising its wet-weather handling, quiet road noise, and comfortable ride quality compared to competitors and run-flat alternatives. While traction and longevity are generally viewed favorably, a few owners noted moderate grip limitations under hard acceleration or confusion regarding all-season versus summer classifications.

f30.bimmerpost.com

“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Top themes
#wet weather handling#ride comfort and softness#low road noise#run flat performance#pricing and value#treadwear and longevity

Based on 21 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—33
Rim diameters—16″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—240 - 300 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2

Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 74 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 78 vs 56 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 59 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 78 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology