Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 66–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 59 · 2,183 reviews

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +16
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–77
    Reviews found online5269
  2. 54

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–70
    Reviews found online4866
  3. 50

    Snow

    Potenza RE040 +14
    36
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online3714
  4. 56

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–62
    Reviews found online4264
  5. 56

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +13
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
    Reviews found online4061
  6. 55

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
    Reviews found online4761
  7. 53

    Handling

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +18
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online5371
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE040Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 55 66
Dry 58 74
Wet 54 68
Snow 50 36
Comfort 56 63
Noise 56 69
Treadwear 55 69
Handling 53 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE040

ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE040

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High level of steering feedback and directness
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or cold conditions
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff construction
All owner themes in the Potenza RE040 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE040

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

Community opinion on the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is generally very positive, with users frequently considering them as affordable, high-performing summer tires ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet conditions. Many drivers compare them favorably or as cost-effective alternatives to premium options like Michelin Pilot Sports, though questions occasionally arise regarding their exact lifespan and wear compared to all-season alternatives.

Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Spirited backroad performance#Wet and dry grip#Value and pricing#Lifespan and tread wear#Comparison with Michelin

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available370
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″9/32″
UTQG140 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE040

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE040 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 58 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Potenza RE040 scores 50 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 54 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

66

Leads

ADVAN Fleva V701

Amazon