Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · none yet
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 3 tests Owners 79 · 6,409 reviews
“Back in the day, I ran summer tires on an MK5 GTI and swore I’d never do that again, as I only got 20k miles out of them. I’ve had 3 other GTIs since and have always run Ultra High Performance All Seasons with zero issues. On my MK7.5 , I’m currently running CONTINENTAL EXTREME CONTACT DWS 06 PLUS and absolutely love them! They’re probably the best tires I’ve run on the 4 GTIs I’ve owned over the years!!! 👍🏾 BTW… I’m in Northern California, where the seasons don’t hit like other parts of the country. 😅”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison79Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online – 85 -
–
Wet
No comparison80Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 74 Reviews found online – 87 -
–
Snow
No comparison76Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online – 71 -
–
Comfort
No comparison77Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online – 81 -
–
Noise
No comparison74Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Professional tests (TWG score) – 71 Reviews found online – 78 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison67Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online – 69 -
–
Handling
No comparison80Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS Reviews found online – 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 76 |
| Dry | – | 79 |
| Wet | – | 80 |
| Snow | – | 76 |
| Comfort | – | 77 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | – | 67 |
| Handling | – | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT
ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Pros
- Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
- Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
- Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
- Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
The community highly regards the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS as an exceptional ultra-high performance all-season tire, frequently praising its superior wet and light snow traction, comfortable ride, and low road noise. While commonly preferred over competitors like Michelin for its value and everyday compliance, some users note trade-offs such as slightly softer sidewalls, minor steering feel loss, initial tread squirm, and occasional balancing or treadwear concerns. Overall, owners enthusiastically recommend it for daily driving, spirited commuting, and versatile year-round capability across a wide range of vehicles.
“I ran the dws on my 700whp corvette ZR1 for 5 years . Never a problem and wear really good . I’ve tracked them in the qtr mile and roll racing . They hooked pretty good ls at the track . Had a 1.60 sixty foot on them”
“I picked these up from tire rack Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 Plus Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires in 255/45ZR19 and these rims MSW Type 37T and the tpms. they were bal;anced and ready to install. I swapped out my stock 21" MYP tires. NYC/Catskills area. they are good in snowy conditions as long as it's not too high above the clearance, I've had to pop the side trim back on when fender hits small mounds of snow .”
“I have these same tires on my SL 550 and my wife's GLC 43 AMG. The tires are wearing great so far. Smooth ride on both vehicles. I have around 16,000 miles on the set on my SL 550 and around 18,000 miles on my wife's SUV. Plenty of tread life left on both sets. 19" wheels on the SL and 20" wheels on the GLC. Both sets are staggered, so no rotating of either set. Will definitely buy these again when needed.”
Based on 138 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT | B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 120 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 560 - 740 A - AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Only Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.