Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 75 · 3 tests Owners 79 · 6,409 reviews

“Back in the day, I ran summer tires on an MK5 GTI and swore I’d never do that again, as I only got 20k miles out of them. I’ve had 3 other GTIs since and have always run Ultra High Performance All Seasons with zero issues. On my MK7.5 , I’m currently running CONTINENTAL EXTREME CONTACT DWS 06 PLUS and absolutely love them! They’re probably the best tires I’ve run on the 4 GTIs I’ve owned over the years!!! 👍🏾 BTW… I’m in Northern California, where the seasons don’t hit like other parts of the country. 😅”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. –

    Dry

    No comparison
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online–85
  2. –

    Wet

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–74
    Reviews found online–87
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    76
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–80
    Reviews found online–71
  4. –

    Comfort

    No comparison
    77
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–75
    Reviews found online–81
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online–78
  6. –

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online–69
  7. –

    Handling

    No comparison
    80
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE050A Pole Position RFTExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
    Reviews found online–80
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT vs Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFTContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Relative Score – 76
Dry – 79
Wet – 80
Snow – 76
Comfort – 77
Noise – 74
Treadwear – 67
Handling – 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT

ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Pros

  • Exceptional wet traction and resistance to hydroplaning
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality that transforms vehicle dynamics
  • Strong dry grip and responsive, predictable cornering capabilities

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter-than-expected lifespan for some drivers
  • Increased road noise and drone developing as the tires wear down
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a 'squishy' feel
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Positive

The community highly regards the Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS as an exceptional ultra-high performance all-season tire, frequently praising its superior wet and light snow traction, comfortable ride, and low road noise. While commonly preferred over competitors like Michelin for its value and everyday compliance, some users note trade-offs such as slightly softer sidewalls, minor steering feel loss, initial tread squirm, and occasional balancing or treadwear concerns. Overall, owners enthusiastically recommend it for daily driving, spirited commuting, and versatile year-round capability across a wide range of vehicles.

Top themes
#Wet traction performance#Ride comfort improvement#Light snow capability#Michelin tire comparison#Soft sidewall feel#Road noise levels#Wheel balancing consistency

Based on 138 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS
Category—All Season
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—120
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 - 740 A - AA A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

Only Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position RFT
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 PLUS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.