Tests – · none yet Owners 34 · 146 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 146 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–45
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
46
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +2874Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 54 (est.) 77 Reviews found online 35 69 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 34.5 = 46
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
47
Wet
ADVAN Fleva V701 +2168Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 52 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 39 65 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 52.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.7 = 47
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
–
Snow
No comparison34Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 50 (est.) Reviews found online – 10 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
42
Comfort
ADVAN Fleva V701 +2163Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 15 63 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 14.8 = 42
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 75 Reviews found online – 62 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70
-
48
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +2169Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 35 61 Potenza RE050A Run Flat: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 48
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050A Run Flat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
29
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Fleva V701 +4271Why this score
Source Potenza RE050A Run Flat ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 29 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 45 | 70 |
| Dry | 46 | 74 |
| Wet | 47 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 34 |
| Comfort | 42 | 63 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 48 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 29 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
45
/ 100
Potenza RE050A Run Flat
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Pros
- Strong grip and predictable handling in dry conditions
- Precise steering response and high-speed cornering stability
- Good overall longevity and mileage for certain drivers on smooth highways
Cons
- Extremely harsh, rigid, and uncomfortable ride quality
- Severe tramlining and tendency to follow ruts or road imperfections
- Poor grip, reduced traction, and nervous handling in wet weather
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Neutral
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
fiestastforum.com
·2022-11-30
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 70 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
45
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 29 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 46 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 47 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 63 vs 42 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Run Flat
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE050A Run Flat or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 47 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 46 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 63 vs 42 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050A Run Flat or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology