tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE070 vs Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 19 + 97 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN NEOVA AD09 leads, 70–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN NEOVA AD09 or Potenza RE070 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 72 (est.)68
    Reviews found online7784

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 74

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 84.2 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 64

    Wet

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6266

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ADVAN NEOVA AD09. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5463

    Potenza RE070: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 54.1 = 59

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online52–

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE070. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Level
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6464

    Potenza RE070: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE070. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ADVAN NEOVA AD09. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +6
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE070ADVAN NEOVA AD09
    Reviews found online7581
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE070Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Relative Score 68 70
Dry 74 75
Wet 64 67
Snow 61 –
Comfort 59 65
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 65 65
Handling (owners) 75 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE070

± 8

ADVAN NEOVA AD09

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE070

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and cornering grip approaching track-day tire levels
  • Stiff sidewalls that drastically improve steering response and vehicle handling
  • Great value and affordability compared to other specialty sport tires

Cons

  • Poor performance and hydroplaning tendency in wet weather, standing water, or heavy rain
  • Harsh ride quality around town due to very stiff sidewalls
  • High levels of road noise at everyday speeds
All owner themes in the Potenza RE070 review

Tire B ADVAN NEOVA AD09

Pros

  • Exceptional heat resistance and consistency during extended track sessions
  • Predictable and communicative handling at the limit
  • Strong wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire

Cons

  • Not as competitive in absolute 'hero' grip as some aggressive 200TW alternatives
  • Can become greasy if over-driven or pushed beyond their thermal operating window
  • High-horsepower vehicles may struggle with traction in lower gears
All owner themes in the ADVAN NEOVA AD09 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070 B · Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—54
Rim diameters—15″ – 21″
Tread depth9/32″8/32″
UTQG140 A A200 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE070

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09

Narrow edge: Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE070 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 65 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 81 vs 75 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 scores 67 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09?

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09, 67 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09?

Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09, 65 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE070 or ADVAN NEOVA AD09?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology