Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 16 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE070 vs Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Potenza RE070 leads, 72–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 94 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +178Why this score
Source Potenza RE070 ADVAN NEOVA AD09 Reviews found online 82 83 -
70
Wet
Potenza RE070 +367Why this score
Source Potenza RE070 ADVAN NEOVA AD09 Reviews found online 70 67 -
66
Comfort
ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +268Why this score
Source Potenza RE070 ADVAN NEOVA AD09 Reviews found online 64 66 -
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE070 +265Why this score
Source Potenza RE070 ADVAN NEOVA AD09 Reviews found online 68 65 -
79
Handling
ADVAN NEOVA AD09 +180Why this score
Source Potenza RE070 ADVAN NEOVA AD09 Reviews found online 79 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE070 | Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 77 | 78 |
| Wet | 70 | 67 |
| Comfort | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 65 |
| Handling | 79 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE070
ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE070
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- Excellent feedback and handling characteristics due to stiff sidewalls
- High value-for-money proposition compared to dedicated track tires
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise during daily driving
- Rapid tread wear when subjected to aggressive or track-focused driving
Tire B ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Pros
- Exceptional heat resistance and consistency during extended track sessions
- Predictable and communicative handling at the limit
- Strong wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire
Cons
- Not as competitive in absolute 'hero' grip as some aggressive 200TW alternatives
- Can become greasy if over-driven or pushed beyond their thermal operating window
- High-horsepower vehicles may struggle with traction in lower gears
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE070 | B · Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 54 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE070
Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE070 and Yokohama ADVAN NEOVA AD09 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE070 is stronger on wet.
Bridgestone Potenza RE070 scores 70 vs 67 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.