tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE080 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 199 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza ER300 leads, 67–65 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Turanza ER300 or Potenza RE080 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6567

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6063

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6167

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE080 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Turanza ER300
    Reviews found online6765
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE080Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Relative Score 65 67
Dry 66 67
Wet 66 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 64 66
Noise – 69
Treadwear 63 66
Handling (owners) 67 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE080

Turanza ER300

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE080

Pros

  • Excellent grip performance in both wet and dry road conditions
  • High durability and impressive tread life for many users
  • Predictable steering response and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in road noise and tire roar over time
  • Ride comfort diminishes as the tire wears
  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from 25,000km to over 60,000km
All owner themes in the Potenza RE080 review

Tire B Turanza ER300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
  • Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking

Cons

  • High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
  • Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080 B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available123
Rim diameters15″14″ – 19″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—320 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE080

Bridgestone Turanza ER300

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better wet and treadwear. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE080 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE080 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 69 vs 66 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 69 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE080 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology