Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 75 + 199 owner reviews. How we score

Turanza ER300 is ahead, 68–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    Turanza ER300 +14
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4768

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.1 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 54

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Turanza ER300 +12
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5370

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    Turanza ER300 +18
    66
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3463

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 33.8 = 48

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Turanza ER300 +10
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4863

    Ecopia EP150: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 55

    Turanza ER300: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    Turanza ER300 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5070

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 60

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 55

    Treadwear

    Turanza ER300 +13
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4769

    Ecopia EP150: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.1 = 55

    Turanza ER300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP150. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 50

    Handling (owners)

    Turanza ER300 +15
    65
    Why this score
    SourceEcopia EP150Turanza ER300
    Reviews found online5065
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 vs Bridgestone Turanza ER300: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Ecopia EP150Bridgestone Turanza ER300
Relative Score 55 68
Dry 54 68
Wet 58 70
Snow 48 66
Comfort 55 65
Noise 60 68
Treadwear 55 68
Handling (owners) 50 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Ecopia EP150

± 7

Turanza ER300

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEcopia EP150Turanza ER300ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #4/16 2014 ADAC 175/65 R14 Summer Tyre Test #2/6 2010 Autocar Tyre Test - FWD – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Ecopia EP150

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low-speed smoothness
  • Generally durable construction capable of handling potholes
  • Satisfactory dry-road handling for casual, daily driving

Cons

  • Frequently cited as dangerous or unpredictable in wet conditions
  • Noticeable increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Inconsistent tread wear, with some users reporting premature failure
All owner themes in the Ecopia EP150 review

Tire B Turanza ER300

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and longevity
  • Reliable dry and wet grip when relatively new
  • Stable, predictable highway handling and straight-line tracking

Cons

  • High road noise and noticeable tire roar, especially on coarser asphalt
  • Firm, sometimes harsh ride quality with stiff sidewalls
  • Deterioration of wet grip and increased ABS/TCS activation as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Turanza ER300 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150 B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available2423
Rim diameters13″ – 17″14″ – 19″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG200 B B320 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Ecopia EP150

Bridgestone Turanza ER300

Winner: Bridgestone Turanza ER300 — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 66 vs 48 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 65 vs 50 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Turanza ER300 scores 68 vs 55 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP150
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza ER300

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 70 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 66 vs 48 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 65 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP150 or Turanza ER300?

Bridgestone Turanza ER300, 68 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology