Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE080 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 44 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC5 is ahead, 72–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 44 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC5 +672Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 65 75 Potenza RE080: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.1 = 72
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
66
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC5 +773Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 65 74 Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
64
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC5 +872Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 75 Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC5 +467Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 61 68 Potenza RE080: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
67
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC5 +673Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ContiMaxContact MC5 Reviews found online 67 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE080 | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 72 |
| Dry | 66 | 72 |
| Wet | 66 | 73 |
| Comfort | 64 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE080
ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE080
Pros
- Excellent grip performance in both wet and dry road conditions
- High durability and impressive tread life for many users
- Predictable steering response and cornering confidence
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise and tire roar over time
- Ride comfort diminishes as the tire wears
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from 25,000km to over 60,000km
Tire B ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080 | B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE080
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better comfort, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE080 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 64 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 73 vs 66 on wet.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 72 vs 66 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 73 vs 67 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 73 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 72 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 72 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE080 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology