Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 40 + 44 owner reviews. How we score
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads, 74–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 75 · 44 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Level75Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 78 78 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 72.2 (est.) + 40% × 78.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC5 +376Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 74 78 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.8 = 73
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 76
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC5 +474Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 77 ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 69.4 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70
ContiMaxContact MC5: 40% × 70.4 (est.) + 60% × 76.7 = 74
No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC5 +569Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ContiMaxContact MC5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 63 70 ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.1 = 64
ContiMaxContact MC5: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiMaxContact MC6 +376Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ContiMaxContact MC5 Reviews found online 79 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 74 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 73 | 76 |
| Comfort | 70 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B ContiMaxContact MC5
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 3 | — |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Narrow edge: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Where the Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 76 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 76 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or ContiMaxContact MC5?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology