Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 9 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE080 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 9 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score
ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 70–65
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
ADVAN Fleva V701 +974Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 63 68 Potenza RE080: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
67
Wet
Level67Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 65 64 Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison36Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 52 (est.) Reviews found online – 12 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 36
No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
61
Comfort
ADVAN Fleva V701 +162Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 58 61 Potenza RE080: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 57.9 = 61
ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74 Reviews found online – 60 ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.5 = 68
-
63
Treadwear
ADVAN Fleva V701 +669Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 60 59 Potenza RE080: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
ADVAN Fleva V701 +771Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Reviews found online 64 71 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison71Why this score
Source Potenza RE080 ADVAN Fleva V701 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE080 | Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 70 |
| Dry | 65 | 74 |
| Wet | 67 | 67 |
| Snow | – | 36 |
| Comfort | 61 | 62 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 69 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 71 |
| Efficiency | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
65
/ 100
Potenza RE080
70
/ 100
ADVAN Fleva V701
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE080
Pros
- Excellent grip performance in both wet and dry road conditions
- High durability and impressive tread life for many users
- Predictable steering response and cornering confidence
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise and tire roar over time
- Ride comfort diminishes as the tire wears
- Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from 25,000km to over 60,000km
Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
- Precise steering response and good road feedback
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
- Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
- Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Bridgestone Potenza RE080
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.
r/mr2
·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24
“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/Civic_Type_R
·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05
“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06
“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness
Based on 22 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080 | B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 70 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 300 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
65
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE080
70
/ 100
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better dry, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE080 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE080 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE080 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE080 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE080 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE080 or ADVAN Fleva V701?
Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology