Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 13 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Potenza RE11 and PureContact LS are level at 70.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Potenza RE11 +671Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 74 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 83 73 Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77
PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Level73Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 74 74 Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73
PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Snow
PureContact LS +1167Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 46 64 Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56
PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
Potenza RE11 +465Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 61 Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69
PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
PureContact LS +270Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 68 73 Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68
PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
PureContact LS +268Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 66 69 Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Potenza RE11 +573Why this score
Source Potenza RE11 PureContact LS Reviews found online 78 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 70 |
| Dry | 77 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 73 |
| Snow | 56 | 67 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | 68 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE11
PureContact LS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE11
Pros
- Surreal and formidable dry grip
- Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
- Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use
Cons
- Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
- Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
- Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
Tire B PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 | B · Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Continental PureContact LS
Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 and Continental PureContact LS are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 is stronger on dry and comfort. Continental PureContact LS is stronger on snow. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 56 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 71 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 56 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or PureContact LS?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology