tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 31 road tests and 13 + 907 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Potenza RE11 and Azenis FK510 are level at 70.

Check price on Amazon · Potenza RE11 Check price on Amazon · Azenis FK510
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Potenza RE11 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 28 tests≈ 74 (est.)73
    Reviews found online8375

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.8 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +10
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 29 tests≈ 72 (est.)88
    Reviews found online7476

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 76.2 = 83

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Potenza RE11 +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4644

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Potenza RE11 +17
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 69 (est.)42
    Reviews found online7068

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 41.7 + 40% × 68.2 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    Potenza RE11 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 67 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6869

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Level
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online6657

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 57.3 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE11 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online7871
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE11Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 70 70
Dry 77 74
Wet 73 83
Snow 56 55
Comfort 69 52
Noise 68 67
Treadwear 66 66
Handling (owners) 78 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE11

Azenis FK510

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE11

Pros

  • Surreal and formidable dry grip
  • Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
  • Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use

Cons

  • Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
  • Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
  • Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
All owner themes in the Potenza RE11 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

jaguarforums.com

“I've got a set of Falken Azenis FK510 on my 20" Detroits, which I've been running for several years. They weren't expensive at the time and not noticeably different to the Pirellis on before - I would buy them again.”
r/FocusST ·4 upvotes ·2020-07-09

“ST feels boaty on new Falken’s I recently purchased a set of 245/40/18 Falken Azenis FK510 to put on my stock wheels. After, the car feels like it’s constantly driving on a wet road. Even after getting heat into the tires, the car feels boaty and like the rear end doesn’t want to follow the front. Any tips? Or did I make a bad choice in tire?”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by alohasurftoad G-Max RS, Falken FK510 or Firestone, all good. +1 on the Falken FK510 , about 500 miles in and very quiet and comfortable. Exceptional dry/wet traction.”
Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—93
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
Tread depth9/32″10/32″
UTQG200 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Falken Azenis FK510

Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 is stronger on comfort, handling and dry. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on wet. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 69 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 74 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Falken Azenis FK510, 83 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 55 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or Azenis FK510?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology