tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Yokohama Advan A050 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 13 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE11 is ahead, 73–62

Check price on Amazon · Potenza RE11 or Advan A050 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan A050
Tire BYokohama

Advan A050

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Potenza RE11 +4
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 74 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8375

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77

    Advan A050: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Potenza RE11 +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7452

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    Advan A050: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Potenza RE11 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7059

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    Advan A050: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11 or Advan A050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE11 +19
    47
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online6633

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    Advan A050: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 33.1 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan A050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE11 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11Advan A050
    Reviews found online7873
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE11Yokohama Advan A050
Relative Score 73 62
Dry 77 73
Wet 73 57
Snow 56 –
Comfort 69 64
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 66 47
Handling (owners) 78 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE11

Advan A050

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE11

Pros

  • Surreal and formidable dry grip
  • Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
  • Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use

Cons

  • Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
  • Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
  • Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
All owner themes in the Potenza RE11 review

Tire B Advan A050

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Predictable and communicative handling characteristics
  • Consistent grip levels maintained throughout the tire's life

Cons

  • Very high price point compared to competitors
  • Rapid tread wear, particularly in softer compounds
  • Poor performance and safety risks in wet or cold conditions
All owner themes in the Advan A050 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 B · Yokohama Advan A050
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG200 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Yokohama Advan A050

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Advan A050 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 66 vs 47 on treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 73 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 69 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 77 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan A050
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE11 or Advan A050?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or Advan A050?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 73 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or Advan A050?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or Advan A050?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or Advan A050?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 66 vs 47 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology