tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 13 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE11 is ahead, 70–65

Check price on Amazon · Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Potenza RE11 +3
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 74 (est.)77
    Reviews found online8369

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 82.7 = 77

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Potenza RE11 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 72 (est.)70
    Reviews found online7465

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 73

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 56

    Snow

    Potenza RE11 +22
    34
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online4610

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 46 = 56

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Potenza RE11 +6
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)62
    Reviews found online7063

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 69

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6862

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 68

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE11. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 66 (est.)74
    Reviews found online6661

    Potenza RE11: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE11. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE11 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE11ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online7871
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE11Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 70 65
Dry 77 74
Wet 73 68
Snow 56 34
Comfort 69 63
Noise 68 70
Treadwear 66 69
Handling (owners) 78 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE11

ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE11

Pros

  • Surreal and formidable dry grip
  • Predictable handling characteristics when pushed to the limit
  • Better-than-expected tread life and longevity under spirited driving and track use

Cons

  • Can become greasy on a hot track if pushed too hard
  • Increases in road noise compared to standard tires
  • Stiff sidewalls that contribute to a firmer ride
All owner themes in the Potenza RE11 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG200 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE11 — better snow, handling and comfort. Pick the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE11 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 13 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 56 vs 34 on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 78 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE11 scores 73 vs 68 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE11
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 73 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 77 vs 74 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 56 vs 34 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Bridgestone Potenza RE11, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE11 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 66 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology