Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 84–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 86 · 32 tests Owners 82 · 21,504 reviews
“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +2592Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 98 Reviews found online 67 84 -
68
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +1785Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 83 Reviews found online 68 87 -
56
Snow
CrossClimate 2 +3389Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 97 Reviews found online 47 76 -
62
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +1072Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 Reviews found online 54 83 -
64
Noise
CrossClimate 2 +1680Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 60 80 -
60
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +2080Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Professional tests (TWG score) – 79 Reviews found online 56 81 -
61
Handling
CrossClimate 2 +1980Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS CrossClimate 2 Reviews found online 61 80
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 84 |
| Dry | 67 | 92 |
| Wet | 68 | 85 |
| Snow | 56 | 89 |
| Comfort | 62 | 72 |
| Noise | 64 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 80 |
| Handling | 61 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE980AS
CrossClimate 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE980AS
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and sporty handling characteristics
- Sharp and responsive initial turn-in
- Competitive pricing within the premium high-performance category
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Poor snow and ice traction compared to other all-season options
- Stiffer sidewall impact comfort relative to competitors like Michelin
Tire B CrossClimate 2
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
- Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
- Long-lasting tread wear and durability
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price
- Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
- Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Community opinion on the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising its exceptional wet-weather grip, impressive winter and snow performance, and comfortable ride quality. While a minority of users report mixed experiences regarding road noise, potential MPG/efficiency drops, or limited benefits in mild climates without snow, the vast majority consider it a gold-standard all-weather tire.
“I recently installed Michelins (LT285/70R17) and previously had Yoko Geolandar G015 (LT285/R20). The Michelin is slightly larger than the Yoko. My highway mileage improved about 0.7 MPG (16.5 MPG), but in town mileage is the same at 13.5. The best mileage on my vehicle with OEM tires was 16.7 MPG highway (275/55R20 Hankook DynaPro). My truck is rated for 15/21. Ride quality is night & day difference (i.e. better). My first choice was the Firestone Destination LE, but it is not offered in my size. It rates higher than the Michelin. I spent a lot of time reviewing the Michelin Aglis CrossClimate. The UPS driver's in my area use the Crossclimate 2, which is bidirectional tread without a mileage warranty. The UPS trucks are getting 40-50K on the tires and the driver's love them. The standard Crossclimate is a one-way tread which does not work well for uniform tire wear on a truck. One complaint about Michelin Defender. The tread blocks are in a row with large spacing between treads. The straight line pattern results in tire wallowing on sections of pavement with seams in the direction of travel or on steel bridges.”
“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”
“Just Had Michelin CrossClimate2 Tires Installed Had a screw in my driver’s side rear tire this past week, and have had a slow leak in my passenger side rear since I bought the car a little over two years ago. The tires had worn down significantly through the years, and with my car being rear wheel drive, I noticed the lack of all-wheel-drive when we had some significant snow and ice here in Philadelphia this past winter. I’m hoping these new tires will improve traction for me in any future snow. Paid about $1,250 for the tires at tirerack.com, and had them delivered to a nearby Firestone where they were installed for about $150, and aligned for another $120. Here’s a couple pictures. Read more”
Based on 404 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 640 B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 89 vs 56 on snow.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 92 vs 67 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 60 on treadwear.
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 61 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.