Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 9 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Vredestein Quatrac Pro — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 9 + 590 owner reviews. How we score
Quatrac Pro is ahead, 71–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 14 tests Owners 73 · 590 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2021 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Quatrac Pro +973Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 63 74 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 64
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Quatrac Pro +1884Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 85 Reviews found online 64 81 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 66
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 85.2 + 40% × 81 = 84
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
Potenza RE980AS +254Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 45 65 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 45.2 = 56
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 47.6 + 40% × 64.7 = 54
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Quatrac Pro +2175Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 47 77 Potenza RE980AS: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.5 = 54
Quatrac Pro: 40% × 72.6 + 60% × 76.9 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
62
Noise
Quatrac Pro +1072Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 75 Reviews found online 55 ≈ 66 (est.) Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 62
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 72
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Quatrac Pro. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
56
Treadwear
Quatrac Pro +460Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 56 Reviews found online 49 67 Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56
Quatrac Pro: 60% × 55.8 + 40% × 67.1 = 60
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
55
Handling (owners)
Quatrac Pro +1873Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Reviews found online 55 73 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison49Why this score
Source Potenza RE980AS Quatrac Pro Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests – 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 71 |
| Dry | 64 | 73 |
| Wet | 66 | 84 |
| Snow | 56 | 54 |
| Comfort | 54 | 75 |
| Noise | 62 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 60 |
| Handling (owners) | 55 | 73 |
| Efficiency | – | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE980AS
Quatrac Pro
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE980AS
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and sporty handling characteristics
- Sharp and responsive initial turn-in
- Competitive pricing within the premium high-performance category
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Poor snow and ice traction compared to other all-season options
- Stiffer sidewall impact comfort relative to competitors like Michelin
Tire B Quatrac Pro
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance with high resistance to aquaplaning
- Remarkably low road noise and high ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires
- Strong and predictable grip in cold, rainy, and mild winter conditions
Cons
- Reduced fuel economy or slight negative impact on range reported by some users
- Mixed feedback on durability, with a few drivers experiencing faster-than-expected tread wear or manufacturing defects
- Subpar performance in heavy snow or packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS | B · Vredestein Quatrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 97 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 500 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Winner: Vredestein Quatrac Pro — better comfort, wet and handling. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 75 vs 54 on comfort.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 84 vs 66 on wet.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 73 vs 55 on handling.
Vredestein Quatrac Pro scores 72 vs 62 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 84 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 73 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 54 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 72 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 75 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE980AS or Quatrac Pro?
Vredestein Quatrac Pro, 60 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology