Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 9 + 15 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Potenza RE980AS 61, Advan Sport AS 60.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport AS
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport AS

All-Season tire

± 8

Tests 61 · 2 tests Owners 60 · 15 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Potenza RE980AS +15
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)42
    Reviews found online6361

    Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 42.3 + 40% × 60.5 = 50

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Potenza RE980AS +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)57
    Reviews found online6465

    Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 57 + 40% × 64.5 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Advan Sport AS +1
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4548

    Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 55

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 56

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Advan Sport AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Advan Sport AS +10
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)62
    Reviews found online4765

    Potenza RE980AS: 40% × 65.1 (est.) + 60% × 47.1 = 54

    Advan Sport AS: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 64.7 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Advan Sport AS +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)73
    Reviews found online5564

    Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.6 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Advan Sport AS +16
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)81
    Reviews found online4960

    Potenza RE980AS: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    Advan Sport AS: 60% × 81 + 40% × 59.7 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE980AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Sport AS +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE980ASAdvan Sport AS
    Reviews found online5663
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS vs Yokohama Advan Sport AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE980ASYokohama Advan Sport AS
Relative Score 61 60
Dry 65 50
Wet 66 60
Snow 55 56
Comfort 54 64
Noise 62 69
Treadwear 56 72
Handling (owners) 56 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE980AS

± 8

Advan Sport AS

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE980AS

Pros

  • Excellent dry grip and sporty handling characteristics
  • Sharp and responsive initial turn-in
  • Competitive pricing within the premium high-performance category

Cons

  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Poor snow and ice traction compared to other all-season options
  • Stiffer sidewall impact comfort relative to competitors like Michelin
All owner themes in the Potenza RE980AS review

Tire B Advan Sport AS

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Good overall traction in wet and dry conditions
  • Excellent value for the money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Potential road force balancing issues reported by some users
  • Some enthusiasts feel ultimate performance capability is lacking
  • Tread life remains largely unproven in early-mileage reviews
All owner themes in the Advan Sport AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG500 A A440 A A
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS

Yokohama Advan Sport AS

Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS and Yokohama Advan Sport AS are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS is stronger on dry and wet. Yokohama Advan Sport AS is stronger on treadwear, comfort and noise. Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 72 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS scores 65 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 64 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama Advan Sport AS scores 69 vs 62 on noise.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS, 66 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Bridgestone Potenza RE980AS, 65 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Neither, by our numbers: 55 vs 56 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 64 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE980AS or Advan Sport AS?

Yokohama Advan Sport AS, 72 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology