Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 10 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk Indy 500 is ahead, 65–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
Firehawk Indy 500 +2174Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 45 78 Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
55
Wet
Firehawk Indy 500 +1267Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 49 65 Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.1 = 67
No road tests of wet for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
Potenza S-02A +1244Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 47 28 Potenza S-02A: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 56
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.8 = 44
No road tests of snow for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
52
Comfort
Firehawk Indy 500 +1466Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 43 64 Potenza S-02A: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 43 = 52
Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 64.4 = 66
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Firehawk Indy 500 +566Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 65 Potenza S-02A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 61
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
52
Treadwear
Firehawk Indy 500 +1466Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 58 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 44 61 Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 52
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Firehawk Indy 500 +2271Why this score
Source Potenza S-02A Firehawk Indy 500 Reviews found online 49 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S-02A | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 65 |
| Dry | 53 | 74 |
| Wet | 55 | 67 |
| Snow | 56 | 44 |
| Comfort | 52 | 66 |
| Noise | 61 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza S-02A
Firehawk Indy 500
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza S-02A
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with reliable road holding
- Superior steering feedback and linear response requiring less slip angle
- Impressive tread longevity for daily driving under normal conditions
Cons
- Poor grip and performance when tires are cold
- Inconsistent tread life expectations, with some users reporting rapid wear
- Can feel skittish in snow, particularly as the tread nears its wear limit
Tire B Firehawk Indy 500
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
- Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
- Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Community sentiment toward the Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers frequently praising it as an exceptional value and budget-friendly alternative to premium summer tires. Owners report strong dry grip, solid wet-weather traction, good comfort, and predictable handling, though some note reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer sidewalls, and a tendency to get greasy during aggressive track sessions. Interest is also growing around the newer V2 version and its updated compound and tread design.
“I have them on my 14 GT. 255 front/285 rear. They have roughly 5k on them and have worn well. Wheel spin has to be intentionally induced now. No more surprises. Highly recommend.”
“Firehawk Indy 500 v2: Summer or All Season Just went to the local Firestone store to get tires. I needed to replace all four (front two for wear and back two from damage to one of them). I expressly asked for non-summer tires. We live in Texas, but it does get below 32 here. This is for a 2019 Genesis G80 Sport 3.3T. They sold me Firehawk Indy 500 v2 tires, even after I confirmed three times that they were not summer tires. The third time I even showed them on my phone and they were adamant that they show as All Season in their system. Did I just get punked? The only thing I could fine about temperature on their website was that these tires have basically a 0 rating for ice. In other articles, they show as dangerous for anything below 40 degrees Fahrenheit . Am I being overconcerned, and it'll be fine here in Texas? Is this something I need to get them to resolve (different tires) or should I go someplace else for tires and return these for my money back?”
“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”
Based on 146 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S-02A | B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 47 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Winner: Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S-02A if snow matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza S-02A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 71 vs 49 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 53 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 66 vs 52 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 67 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 53 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A, 56 vs 44 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza S-02A or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 66 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology