Tests 73 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 259 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 259 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 SuperSport is ahead, 76–54
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 14 tests Owners 77 · 259 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Auto Bild UHP 19 inch Tyre Test (wet handling)
Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 10 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 87 | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 88 | 45 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 86.6 + 40% × 87.5 = 87
Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 53
No road tests of dry for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 83 | ≈ 59 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 80 | 49 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 82.8 + 40% × 80.1 = 82
Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 55
No road tests of wet for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 62 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 47 |
Potenza S-02A: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 56
No road tests of snow for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 28 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 43 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 40% × 28.2 + 60% × 68 = 52
Potenza S-02A: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 43 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Potenza S-02A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests | 33 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 52 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 32.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 50
Potenza S-02A: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 61
No road tests of noise for Potenza S-02A. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 58 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 44 |
Eagle F1 SuperSport: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
Potenza S-02A: 60% × 58.2 (est.) + 40% × 43.7 = 52
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 SuperSport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S-02A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 86 | 49 |
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests | 24 | – |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Bridgestone Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 54 |
| Dry | 87 | 53 |
| Wet | 82 | 55 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | 52 | 52 |
| Noise | 50 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 52 |
| Handling (owners) | 86 | 49 |
| Efficiency | 24 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 SuperSport
Potenza S-02A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | B · Bridgestone Potenza S-02A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 75 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 080 - 300 A - AA A | 140 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S-02A if noise matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza S-02A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 86 vs 49 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 87 vs 53 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 82 vs 55 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 65 vs 52 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 82 vs 55 on our wet score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 87 vs 53 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Potenza S-02A, 61 vs 50 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 52 vs 52 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport, 65 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology