Nexen N FERA SUR4 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Nexen N FERA SUR4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 79 + 6 owner reviews. How we score

N FERA SUR4 is ahead, 62–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N FERA SUR4
Tire BNexen

N FERA SUR4

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 6 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    N FERA SUR4 +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5273

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 59

    Wet

    Potenza S001 RFT +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5550

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 59

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 58.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 55

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 41

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)–
    Reviews found online21–

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 53.8 (est.) + 40% × 21.1 = 41

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    N FERA SUR4 +6
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3951

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 38.5 = 54

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 50.6 = 60

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 60

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 60

    No road tests of noise for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Potenza S001 RFT +3
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5347

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 53.3 = 58

    N FERA SUR4: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for N FERA SUR4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 51

    Handling (owners)

    N FERA SUR4 +20
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001 RFTN FERA SUR4
    Reviews found online5171
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT vs Nexen N FERA SUR4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001 RFTNexen N FERA SUR4
Relative Score 57 62
Dry 57 71
Wet 59 55
Snow 41 –
Comfort 54 60
Noise 60 –
Treadwear 58 55
Handling (owners) 51 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza S001 RFT

N FERA SUR4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
  • Strong dry-road grip

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
  • Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 RFT review

Tire B N FERA SUR4

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and track-day performance
  • Precise steering feedback and predictable handling
  • Cost-effective alternative to more expensive track tires

Cons

  • High level of road noise
  • Poor wet-weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning tendencies in heavy rain
  • Fast tread wear
All owner themes in the N FERA SUR4 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT B · Nexen N FERA SUR4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available14—
Rim diameters17″ – 21″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG280 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

Nexen N FERA SUR4

Winner: Nexen N FERA SUR4 — better handling, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT if wet and treadwear matter most to you. Nexen N FERA SUR4 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 71 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N FERA SUR4 scores 60 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 59 vs 55 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Tire B · Nexen N FERA SUR4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4?

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT, 59 vs 55 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4?

Nexen N FERA SUR4, 71 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4?

Nexen N FERA SUR4, 60 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza S001 RFT or N FERA SUR4?

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT, 58 vs 55 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology