Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Potenza S001 RFT leads, 55–52 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 56

    Dry

    Potenza S001 RFT +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online5051
  2. 59

    Wet

    Level
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online5555
  3. 53

    Snow

    ContiSportContact 5 SSR +11
    42
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online4223
  4. 52

    Comfort

    Potenza S001 RFT +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online3539
  5. 58

    Noise

    Potenza S001 RFT +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online4649
  6. 46

    Treadwear

    Potenza S001 RFT +12
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online3253
  7. 42

    Handling

    Potenza S001 RFT +9
    51
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5 SSRPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online4251
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5 SSRBridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Relative Score 52 55
Dry 56 57
Wet 59 59
Snow 53 42
Comfort 52 54
Noise 58 59
Treadwear 46 58
Handling 42 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Potenza S001 RFT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Potenza S001 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
  • Strong dry-road grip

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
  • Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 RFT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Category—Summer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1614
Rim diameters17″ – 20″17″ – 21″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A280 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — better treadwear and handling. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 58 vs 46 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 53 vs 42 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 51 vs 42 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

55

Narrow edge

Potenza S001 RFT

Amazon