Tests – · none yet Owners 50 · 14 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 79 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportContact 5 SSR leads, 58–54 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 46 · 79 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
58
Dry
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +454Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 52 47 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58
Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 54
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +558Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 60 53 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63
Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +1541Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 53 (est.) Reviews found online 48 23 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 62.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 56
Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 22.8 = 41
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
50
Comfort
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +446Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 40 35 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 40% × 63.8 (est.) + 60% × 40.4 = 50
Potenza S001 RFT: 40% × 62.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.6 = 46
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
ContiSportContact 5 SSR +161Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 53 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 56.2 = 62
Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 61
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
50
Treadwear
Potenza S001 RFT +858Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 40 53 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.7 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison49Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR Potenza S001 RFT Reviews found online – 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 54 |
| Dry | 58 | 54 |
| Wet | 63 | 58 |
| Snow | 56 | 41 |
| Comfort | 50 | 46 |
| Noise | 62 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Potenza S001 RFT
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Potenza S001 RFT
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
- Strong dry-road grip
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
- Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 25 | 14 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 280 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 8 | 8 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Narrow edge: Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR — better snow, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT if treadwear matters most to you. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 56 vs 41 on snow.
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 58 vs 50 on treadwear.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 63 vs 58 on wet.
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR scores 58 vs 54 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR, 63 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR, 58 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR, 56 vs 41 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR, 50 vs 46 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or Potenza S001 RFT?
Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT, 58 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology