tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 79 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat 56, Potenza S001 RFT 55.

Check price on Amazon · Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat Check price on Amazon · Potenza S001 RFT
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +4
    54
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online5346

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 58

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.2 = 54

    No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 57

    Wet

    Potenza S001 RFT +1
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5253

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.9 = 57

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 60.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    42
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online–22

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 55 (est.) + 40% × 21.8 = 42

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 50

    Comfort

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat +5
    45
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online4134

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 40.6 = 50

    Potenza S001 RFT: 40% × 61.6 (est.) + 60% × 33.7 = 45

    No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    61
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–52

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Potenza S001 RFT +4
    58
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online4653

    Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    Potenza S001 RFT: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58

    No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza S001 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    48
    Why this score
    SourceEagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatPotenza S001 RFT
    Reviews found online–48
Scores at a glance
CategoryGoodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlatBridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Relative Score 56 55
Dry 58 54
Wet 57 58
Snow – 42
Comfort 50 45
Noise – 61
Treadwear 54 58
Handling (owners) – 48

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat

± 8

Potenza S001 RFT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Potenza S001 RFT

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability
  • Precise steering feedback and handling responsiveness
  • Strong dry-road grip

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
  • High levels of road noise and cabin vibration
  • Harsh, stiff ride quality over road imperfections
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 RFT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—14
Rim diameters—17″ – 21″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—280 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT

Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat and Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat is stronger on comfort and dry. Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT is stronger on treadwear. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat scores 50 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat scores 58 vs 54 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT scores 58 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat or Potenza S001 RFT?

Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat or Potenza S001 RFT?

Neither, by our numbers: 57 vs 58 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat or Potenza S001 RFT?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat, 58 vs 54 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat or Potenza S001 RFT?

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat, 50 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 RunOnFlat or Potenza S001 RFT?

Bridgestone Potenza S001 RFT, 58 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology