Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 55 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 6 + 0 road tests and 5,807 + 31 owner reviews. How we score
Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 70–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 55 · 5,807 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 31 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 79 | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 80 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.1 + 40% × 62.7 = 73
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / – tests | 84 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 69 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 84.4 + 40% × 62.3 = 76
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 59 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 38 | 61 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 37.6 = 51
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 63 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 51 | 67 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 63.3 + 40% × 51.1 = 58
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of comfort for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 56 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 68 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 58.6 = 57
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67
No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests | 58 | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 48 | 61 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58 + 40% × 48.4 = 54
Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 79 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 65 | 70 |
| Dry | 73 | 75 |
| Wet | 76 | 69 |
| Snow | 51 | 65 |
| Comfort | 58 | 68 |
| Noise | 57 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza S001
Advan Neova AD08
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Potenza S001 finished ahead 0 times and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 1 times.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S001 | Advan Neova AD08 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #10/10 | #4/10 | – | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2014 EVO Max Performance Summer Tyre Test · 225/45 R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“Brand New Bridgestone Potenza S001 Tyres worn after 10k mileage? So I got 4 brand new tyres last June from Costco, 255/35 R19. I only drive locally, occasional trips to another city. 10k mileage later, my front two tyres flagged up on my recent MOT as : Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge CHANGE ASAP (5.2.3 (e)) Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge EDGED (5.2.3 (e)) Seems surprising to me as I don't drive crazy, occasional spirited driving. 2011 Audi s5. is this normal? Thinking of getting another brand this time for the front two tyres. Car is a quattro but same types on same axis should suffice? Any recommendations on tyres? Read more”
“I run the Bridgestone Potenza S001 Ultra-High Summer Peformance Tire 215/45R/20s on the rear and 195s on the front. They ride softer than stock tires. Not cheap tho.”
“Thanks for the comments. I'm not sure a paltry $3m fine will move BMW to more or quicker recalls. It's just a drop in the bucket for them. In this case too, BMW has yet to accept any responsibility for the tire issues and has put it all on Goodyear for warranty and replacement. This is the sort of BS thing I am expecting to happen, although unlike the LS2's, I have been assured that there are no Excellence tires to be had anywhere. I just hope they do the right thing here. The latest issue of Roundel reviews the new F30 and they claim the new Bridgestone Potenza S001 uses "third generation run-flat technology", whatever that is, and say its a great tire. I called around though, and no tire dealers even have that tire in their system yet.”
Based on 43 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | — |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 180 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, snow and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if wet matters most to you.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 61 on handling.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 65 vs 51 on snow.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 58 on comfort.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 67 vs 57 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 76 vs 69 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 65 vs 51 on our snow score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 67 vs 57 on our noise score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 63 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology