Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Bridgestone Potenza S001 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 6 road tests and 12,721 + 5,822 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 81–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,721 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Potenza S001

Summer

± 7

Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)

“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +16
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 4 tests8979
    Reviews found online8459
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–0100%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 59.4 = 71

  2. 89

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +14
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 4 tests9385
    Reviews found online8560
    Straight Aquaplaning (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%97%
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 0–296%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–196%100%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.5 = 89

    Potenza S001: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 59.7 = 75

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    50
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online–37

    Potenza S001: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50

    No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +23
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 1 tests8263
    Reviews found online7247

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.5 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    Potenza S001: 40% × 63 + 60% × 46.5 = 53

  5. 70

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +14
    56
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / 3 tests7356
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)55
    Noise (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–098%97%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 70

    Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.2 = 56

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +19
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7859
    Reviews found online6043
    Wear (% of best) · 2 shared tests · wins 2–085%74%

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    Potenza S001: 60% × 58.6 + 40% × 42.8 = 52

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +22
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Reviews found online8159
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    Pilot Sport 4 +35
    41
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4Potenza S001
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 3 tests7641
    Rolling Resistance (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–088%73%
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Bridgestone Potenza S001: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Bridgestone Potenza S001
Relative Score 81 64
Dry 87 71
Wet 89 75
Snow – 50
Comfort 76 53
Noise 70 56
Treadwear 71 52
Handling (owners) 81 59
Efficiency 76 41

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 7

Potenza S001

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 4 tests that ran both, Michelin Pilot Sport 4 finished ahead 4 times and Bridgestone Potenza S001 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4Potenza S001ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 96% +4.2 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Dry Handling Dry 100% 99% +1.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 100% 97% +3.3 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Braking Wet 96% 100% −3.6 0–2 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18
Wet Handling Wet 96% 100% −3.6 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Noise Noise 98% 97% +1.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Wear Treadwear 85% 74% +11.6 2–0 in 2 shared tests Newest: 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test · 225/40 R18
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 88% 73% +15.5 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 45% 54% −9.0 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #16/20 #20/20 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Value Cost 60% 60% −0.2 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test · 245/45 R18
Overall Ranking Overall #2/14 #9/14 – 4–0 in 4 shared tests Newest: 2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B Potenza S001

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

uk-polos.net ·2021-09-20

“So I went through my front two Bridgestones in 8000 mile - my own fault really. Anyway I've had Michelin PS4's fitted on the front since that's what 90% of people say to get. Well... They are sh*t in my opinion. I'm running 38psi in the front, so I'm open to trying different pressures if anyone else runs anything else. Twice under heavy breaking the car has completely lost traction - this NEVER happened with the same amount of speed and breaking on the Bridgestones. Three times when throwing the car into a hard corner the tyres have felt like they were skidding or possibly folding which resulted into a late grip which then whipped the car. Maybe I just need to get used to them but I've not noticed too much of an improvement in a straight line and breaking and cornering on them has been shocking. The cornering just seems awful, I've lost so much confidence driving the car now. I had the Eibach Sportline springs fitted just before I changed the tyres and the handling went through the roof, now all that seems to of gone... Any thoughts? Pressures? Do the tyres just not fit how I drive?”

r/ft86 ·3 upvotes ·2022-01-09

“I just installed A/S PS4 from Michelin on my BRZ recently & man they are so nice. How quiet it is, is wow, night and day. They handle quite nice except when it's still cold (sub 40F) on highway, traction control triggers but it may bc I'm lowered and yet to do my alignment. I don't know compared to stock, I was on Falken prior. I am using different tire set-up then stock however. I have 245/35 at the front and 265/35 in rear. My only regret is not going up to 40 on the sidewall for more meat. This is on 18" wheels.”

r/JettaGLI ·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

Based on 43 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Bridgestone Potenza S001
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6255
Rim diameters16″ – 20″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—8/32″
UTQG300 - 320 A - AA A280 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—50 psi
Sizes in common3939

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better efficiency, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 41 on efficiency.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 53 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 52 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet braking

Bridgestone Potenza S001 won 2 of 2 shared wet braking tests.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza S001

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 75 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 56 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 53 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 52 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, Pilot Sport 4 or Potenza S001?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 41 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology