Summer tire Updated November 2026

Bridgestone Potenza S001 review

± 7

Relative score 60% tests + 40% owners

Better than 45% of the summer tires we score.

Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews analysed Road tests 72 · 6 tests

How scores work
Add your size for an exact match
/R

The Amazon link then searches this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza S001 has a Relative Score of 62 out of 100 among summer tires. In 28 road tests with an overall ranking it finished first 0 times and in the top three 2 times. Testers rate it best for wet (85) and weakest for efficiency (41). 5,822 owner reviews rate it 52 out of 100. 48% would buy it again.

Projected tread life in 2 wear tests: about 31,000 km (19,000 miles) on average, newest 2020.

  • Strength: Wet 85 — 1st of 20 (2020 Auto Bild Summer tire Test), 1st of 49 (2020 tire Market Overview Braking Test)
  • Weak point: Efficiency 41 — 8th of 8 (2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP tire Test), 20th of 20 (2020 Auto Bild Summer tire Test)
Community sentiment Mixed Read the buzz
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats

Owners rate it 20 points lower than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews found online; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

How scores work
Relative score
0–100. Blends road tests (60%) and owner reviews (40%) category by category, the same way on every TireWheelGuide page. With only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from it, so the score stays closer to average. It needs at least one road test or five owner reviews.
Road tests
0–100 per score, from published tests, newer tests counting more. Each result is compared with every other tire in the same test, so a win against a strong field counts for more. The average tested tire gets 70, the best 100; with only one or two tests a tire stays nearer 70. The discipline rows show % of the best tire in that test.
Owner reviews
0–100 from the owner reviews we found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates and scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70. With only a few reviews a tire stays near the average.

Full methodology

By owner reviews

52/100

From 5,822 owner reviews analysed, scaled like the road tests: the average tested tire gets 70.

Would buy again 48%
Dry
Overall dry
59
Wet
Overall wet
60
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
37
Comfort
Overall comfort
47
Noise
Overall noise
55
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
43
Handling
Overall handling
59

Own these tires? Write a review →

By road tests

72/100

Scaled across every tested tire: the average gets 70, the best 100.

Dry
79
Wet
85
Comfort
63
Noise
56
Treadwear
59
Efficiency
41
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
75%
Dry Handling
63%
Subj. Dry Handling
91%
Wet Braking
64%
Subj. Wet Handling
75%
Wet Handling
65%
Straight Aquaplaning
67%
Curved Aquaplaning
44%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
44%
Inside Noise level
25%
Subjective Comfort
50%
Rolling Resistance
31%
Price
10%
Wear
72%

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 5,822 owner reviews found online.

The Bridgestone Potenza S001 divides opinion sharply, functioning as a polarizing ultra-high-performance tire praised for its sharp steering response and dry-weather agility, yet heavily criticized for high road noise, a stiff ride—especially in run-flat variants—and inconsistent wet-weather traction. While many drivers appreciate its OEM fitment pedigree on European performance sedans and hot hatches, a significant portion of users report rapid treadwear and a lack of progressive feedback at the limit.

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability
  • Durable tread life reported by conservative or highway drivers

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
  • Fast treadwear when driven aggressively

Worth knowing

  • Users running 18-inch and 19-inch run-flat variants on BMW models frequently noted a significantly firmer, harsher ride and high cabin noise compared to standard non-run-flat options.
  • Lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 Miata often felt overly bouncy, with drivers reporting sudden rear-end twitchiness in wet or cooler conditions.

29 published test appearances (6 in the score)

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires · 215/60R18

12th of 22
DisciplinePlacementField position
Tested Tread Life (Miles)17th of 22

Source: Consumer Reports

2020 Auto Bild Summer tire Test · 245/45 R18

11th of 20
Best: Wet Braking · 1st Weakest: Rolling Resistance · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking1st of 20
Wet Handling1st of 20
Dry Braking7th of 20
Dry Handling12th of 20
Rolling Resistance20th of 20
Straight Aquaplaning7th of 20
Noise20th of 20
Value19th of 20
Price18th of 20
Wear12th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership20th of 20

Source: Auto Bild

2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer tire Test · 225/40 R18

9th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wear12th of 16

Source: ADAC

2020 tire Market Overview Braking Test · 245/45 R18

3rd of 49
Best: Wet Braking · 1st Weakest: Dry Braking · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking1st of 49
Dry Braking7th of 49

Source: Auto Bild

2020 TCS Summer Tire Test R18 · 225/40R18

9th of 15

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: TCS

2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP tire Test · 245/30 R20

5th of 8
Best: Straight Aquaplaning · 2nd Weakest: Wet Braking · 8th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 8
Wet Handling5th of 8
Dry Braking5th of 8
Dry Handling5th of 8
Rolling Resistance8th of 8
Straight Aquaplaning2nd of 8
Dry Handling (tester's mark)2nd of 8
Comfort (tester's mark)5th of 8
Wet Handling (tester's mark)3rd of 8
Noise8th of 8

Source: Sport Auto

2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 · 245/30R20

5th of 8

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Motor und Sport

2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP tire Test · 245/30 R20

6th of 8
Best: Straight Aquaplaning · 3rd Weakest: Wet Braking · 7th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking7th of 8
Wet Handling6th of 8
Dry Braking7th of 8
Dry Handling6th of 8
Rolling Resistance7th of 8
Straight Aquaplaning3rd of 8
Noise6th of 8

Source: Auto Bild

2015 Sport Auto 235/35 R19 UHP tire Test · 235/35 R19

6th of 7

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Sport Auto

2014 EVO Max Performance Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

10th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: evo

2014 Auto Review Max Performance tire Test · 255/40 R19

5th of 7

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Autoreview

2014 ACE Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

5th of 11

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: ACE

2013 Auto Express Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

7th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Express

2013 Auto Review Performance Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

7th of 9

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Autoreview

2013 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer tire Test · 225/40 R18

8th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Sport Auto

2013 Auto Bild Performance Summer tire Test · 225/35 R18

4th of 8

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Bild

2013 European Summer Sports tire Test · 225/45 R17

9th of 18

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

2012 EVO Summer tire Test · 225/45 R17

5th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: evo

2012 Sport Auto Summer tire Test · 235/35 R19

8th of 9

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Sport Auto

2012 Auto Bild Max Performance tire Test · 225/45 R17

5th of 15

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Bild

2012 Autobild 50 tire Braking Test · 225/45 R17

8th of 45

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Bild

2012 EVO Max Performance tire Test · 235/40 R18

6th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: evo

2011 Auto Express Ultra High Performance tire Test · 225/45 R17

8th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Express

2011 AMS Ultra High Performance tire Test · 225/45 R17

3rd of 11

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Motor und Sport

2011 Sport Auto Max Performance Summer tire Test · 245/40 R18

4th of 7

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Sport Auto

2011 Autobild Max Performance Summer tire Test · 225/40 r18

6th of 10

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Bild

2011 Auto Zeitung Max Performance tire Test · 225/45 r17

7th of 14

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: Auto Zeitung

2011 Subjective shootout - 255/40 R19 Max Performance Summer tires · 255/40 R19

3rd of 3

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

2010 EVO FWD tire Test · 235/35 r19

7th of 9

Only the final ranking was published for this test, not the results per discipline.

Source: evo

Bridgestone Potenza S001 specs & sizes

Prices vary by size, so each one links out separately.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

What owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of the scores above.

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

Sentiment breakdown
Positive19%
Mixed19%
Negative30%
Neutral33%
Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

From 43 threads and comments.

Reviews from our readers

Drivers who have these tires on their car, in their own words. We check every review before it goes live.

No reviews from our readers yet

Driving on the Bridgestone Potenza S001? Tell other drivers how it grips, rides and wears.

Write a review
Overall rating
Rate what you have tried (optional)
Dry grip
Wet grip
Handling
Ride comfort
Quietness
Treadwear
Would you buy them again? (optional)

At least 40 characters.

Leave it empty to post anonymously.

We read every review before it goes live. Your IP address is never shown; a scrambled form of it is kept for up to a year to stop spam.

Bridgestone Potenza S001 compared

Other tires to consider

Ranked by our Relative score, weighed against how many reviews and tests stand behind it.

Top rated summer tires

  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

    1,946 owner reviews · 31 tests

    89 Check price on Amazon
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 5

    6,538 owner reviews · 23 tests

    86 Check price on Amazon
  3. Michelin Primacy 5 Energy

    600 owner reviews · 1 test

    86 Check price on Amazon

More from Bridgestone

  1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

    555 owner reviews · 34 tests

    81 Check price on Amazon
  2. Bridgestone Blizzak 6

    12 owner reviews · 26 tests

    81 Check price on Amazon
  3. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo

    72 owner reviews · 5 tests

    79 Check price on Amazon
All Bridgestone tires

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.