Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 80–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001

Summer

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 56 · 5,804 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (straight aqua)

“Potenza S001 cracking Has anyone had issues with their OEM Bridgestone Potenza S001 tires cracking? I have OEM tires on my 2018 CLub with 17k miles with cracking in the treads for all 4 tires and because they are 4 years + 3 months past manufacture date, Bridgestone told me to Beat It. These are $185 tires that don't last 4 seasons....why would I ever buy them if they are PoS?”

Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

Tests 84 · 21 tests Owners 74 · 12,686 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test (straight aqua)

“CC2s fitted yesterday. Initial subjective reaction are they deffinately seem both quieter and more comfortable than the stock PS4. I did a non scientific noise test using a app on my phone. On my way to have the tyres changed I drove a section of the A460 toward & from Cannock, approx half a mile in each direction. I did exactly the same run at the same speed with the CC2s a couple of hours later. This is a fairly rough surface well worn tarmac but I avoided all ruts & holes. PS4: 41psi 50mph, average noise level 67.4db. The average being registered by the app, not my calculation. CC2: 40 psi 50mph, average noise level 64.6db. In both cases the phone lay on the central console forward of the tray & armrest. The comfort feeling is the CC2s are softer, damping ridges & ruts better than the PS4, while driving a route of 14 miles each way I drive every Tuesday & Thursday & consists of a wide range of different surfaces including the newer super smooth quiete tarmac.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +13
    85
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)7988
    Reviews found online6381
    Dry Braking (% of best)96%96%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%99%
  2. 75

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +12
    87
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)8491
    Reviews found online6281
    Wet Braking (% of best)84%97%
    Wet Handling (% of best)94%100%
  3. 51

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online39–
  4. 59

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +19
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)6383
    Reviews found online5171
  5. 52

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +22
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)4876
    Reviews found online5872
  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)5876
    Reviews found online4961
  7. 61

    Handling

    Pilot Sport 4 +17
    78
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Pilot Sport 4
    Reviews found online6178
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Relative Score 65 80
Dry 72 85
Wet 75 87
Snow 51 –
Comfort 59 78
Noise 52 74
Treadwear 54 70
Handling 61 78

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza S001

Pilot Sport 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza S001Pilot Sport 4ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 96% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 96% #4/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test −0.3 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test −0.5 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 93% #7/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 76% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test +16.2 Different tests
Noise Other 96% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #5/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test −2.5 Different tests
Price Other 54% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 56% #11/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test −2.0 Different tests
Value Other 60% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 69% #10/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −9.1 Different tests
Wear Other 62% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 74% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −12.0 Same test
Overall Ranking Overall 48% #12/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 50% #2/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test −2.4 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 95% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test −5.0 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 78% #5/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test −7.8 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 90% #4/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 96% #2/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test −17.8 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Same test
Wet Braking Wet 84% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 97% #4/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −12.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 100% #1/10 · 2017 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test −5.6 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 review

Tire B Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

Based on 43 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

bimmerfest.com ·2024-10-19

“Wow! You burn rubber. I totally appreciate what you’ve said and on my old e60 I ran both contis D06 and Michelins ps4 for 3 sets each. Both different feel and wear. Contis lasted longer but didn’t feel as nice as PS4. Now I’m in another BMW and cannot rotate the same way with a staggered wheel size. I’m in NC, when I drove PS4, in cold weather, they wore out quickly. They are a summer tire for sure, but I will use a slightly higher pressure to lengthen service life. That camber is rough on the inner tire shoulder / tread and the all season contains held up better there.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2 upvotes ·2020-11-13

“First time post for me on Bitog. I just installed the new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires on my 2017 Mazda GT. Noise doesn't seem to be an issue I'm experiencing. Prior to the new Pilot Sports 4's all seasons I had the Michelin Pilot Sport AS 3+ and the 4's are much quieter on the Mazda. The 4's feel a tad bit softer in ride, quieter and handle just as nice. However, they are new rubber and the tread pattern is completely different from the Michelin Pilot Sports AS 3+ . I've only put about 500 miles on them, but so far, I really like them for their ride comfort, noise, stability and wet/dry grip levels. They feel like a more mature AS3+ if you have them now”

r/RZ34 ·1 upvote ·2026-10-08

“Switched from the garbage stock Potenza's to Continental DWS06 a week after grabbing my Z. Absolutely fucking worth it. I got Swift R lowering springs installed and that also made a great improvement. Z feels much more confidant and way more composed on my twisty roads and roundabouts My ND Miata also came with the same Potenza's and I went with the Michelin PS4's. Transformed the handling as well”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5562
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 20″
Tread depth8/32″—
UTQG280 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better noise, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 74 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 78 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 78 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 4

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

80

Leads

Pilot Sport 4

Amazon