Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 6 + 23 road tests and 5,822 + 6,538 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 86–64
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 6 tests Owners 52 · 5,822 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 87 · 6,538 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling (tester's mark))
“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 23 tests | 79 | 93 |
| Reviews found online | 59 | 90 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 59.4 = 71
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.2 + 40% × 90.2 = 92
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 4 / 23 tests | 85 | 94 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 93 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 85.1 + 40% × 59.7 = 75
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 93.7 + 40% × 93.3 = 94
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 60 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 37 | – |
Potenza S001: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 36.5 = 50
No road tests of snow for Potenza S001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests | 63 | 71 |
| Reviews found online | 47 | 83 |
Potenza S001: 40% × 63 + 60% × 46.5 = 53
Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 83.4 = 78
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 15 tests | 56 | 33 |
| Reviews found online | 55 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Potenza S001: 60% × 55.7 + 40% × 55.2 = 56
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.3 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 47
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 6 tests | 59 | 92 |
| Reviews found online | 43 | 78 |
Potenza S001: 60% × 58.6 + 40% × 42.8 = 52
Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92 + 40% × 77.9 = 86
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 59 | 89 |
| Source | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 17 tests | 41 | 63 |
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 86 |
| Dry | 71 | 92 |
| Wet | 75 | 94 |
| Snow | 50 | – |
| Comfort | 53 | 78 |
| Noise | 56 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 52 | 86 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 89 |
| Efficiency | 41 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza S001
Pilot Sport 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza S001 | Pilot Sport 5 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #7/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 95% #10/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 94% #6/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 91% #9/50 · 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 90% #4/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/4 · 2026 AutoView Value Sport Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wear | Treadwear | 85% #12/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 93% #2/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 73% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 92% #3/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 54% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 56% #13/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Cost | #20/20 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | #13/20 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Value | Cost | 60% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 71% #15/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires | #9/50 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.
“The SL received 4 early Christmas presents. Had to replace the original factory Bridgestone run flat tires due to age. Was advised by the Mercedes Benz service department to replace the 8 year old tires even though the car only has 875 (now 900) miles. Costco had them in stock and approximately 1 hour later I was on my way back home. They wouldn’t sell me anything but run flat tires, no spare tire etc., and this is the only run flat tire that they offer in 19 inch tire size. Hope this helps anyone else who needs to buy new tires for their SL. Happy Holidays, Mike”
“Had a set of run flats for a brief period, heavy tires, very stiff sidewalls, wouldn't run them again.. .”
“Had them on our old 520d Tourer and no complaints, decent in the wet from what I can remember.”
Based on 43 community posts
Community sentiment towards the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is largely positive, with drivers frequently praising its outstanding wet grip, daily driving comfort, and impressive tread life. While widely recommended as a dependable, premium all-round performance tire, some enthusiasts criticize it for having a slightly numb steering feel, softer sidewalls, and poor heat resistance during track use compared to more aggressive alternatives.
“Have to replace my tyres soon, MC7 or PS5? Hi guys, I need to replace the tyres on my civic soon and I’m stuck between the MC7 and the PS5. I not a guy who will driving 180km/h in raining day so i think both performance is good enough for me. I did some research, it seems like MC7 have better performance overall. Also found that MC7 is cheaper than PS5 in my country (around RM600-700 cheaper for 4 tyres). I prefer tread life > noise/ comfort > performance (rarely drive over 120). Any feedback on the 2 brands would be super helpful. Thanks! === UPDATED === Thank you all for suggestions and opinions. So at the end i pick the MC7. Reasons: It’s possibly quieter compared to the PS5 The price is cheaper and come with 1 year premium (or what name i forgot) warranty There’s a Continental authorized dealer near my place I’ve never tried Continental before, so I decided to give it a try At the moment, the driving experience is a bit quieter than the previous PS4 (which is expected since it’s a new tire). As for performance, I haven’t really pushed it to the limit, but it’s more than sufficient for me, didn’t experience any wheel spin or loss of traction so far. One thing I do notice is that I can constantly hear small stones sticking to the tire and hitting the wheel arch which is very annoying. Also, on a personal note, I still prefer the sidewall shape of the PS5, so it took me some time to get used to the rounded sidewall of the MC7 Read more”
“Michelin PS5 Delaminating Near new PS5, running a low speed track, and the fronts basically fell apart after 2 sessions. I know these aren't track-focussed tires, but is this really expected for them? Looks like the tires got too hot, but I'm just shocked how poorly they performed on a stock car (Golf R). Not sure if it's worth contacting Michelin over this or not. Read more”
“look at camskill,always the cheapest,ive just gotten the michelin ps5 for my M4 ,not fitted yet as my conti sport 7 still have life,only bought last month as there was a cashback offer from michelin at camskill,i got £80 so got 2 x 275-35-19 and x2 255-35-19 for £617 delivered,”
Based on 173 community posts
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 55 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 8/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 320 - 340 A - B A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 34 | 34 |
Bridgestone Potenza S001
Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if noise matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 86 vs 52 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 59 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 78 vs 53 on comfort.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 63 vs 41 on efficiency.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 75 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 71 on our dry score.
Bridgestone Potenza S001, 56 vs 47 on our noise score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 78 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 86 vs 52 on our treadwear score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 63 vs 41 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology