Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Azenis FK510 is ahead, 70–63

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza S001

Summer

Tests 71 · 6 tests Owners 56 · 5,804 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 49 in 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test (wet braking)

“Potenza S001 cracking Has anyone had issues with their OEM Bridgestone Potenza S001 tires cracking? I have OEM tires on my 2018 CLub with 17k miles with cracking in the treads for all 4 tires and because they are 4 years + 3 months past manufacture date, Bridgestone told me to Beat It. These are $185 tires that don't last 4 seasons....why would I ever buy them if they are PoS?”

Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (value)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7973
    Reviews found online6376
    Dry Braking (% of best)96%93%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%98%
  2. 75

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +8
    83
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)8487
    Reviews found online6277
    Wet Braking (% of best)100%91%
    Wet Handling (% of best)94%99%
  3. 51

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +4
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online3945
  4. 59

    Comfort

    Potenza S001 +7
    52
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)6342
    Reviews found online5168
  5. 52

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +16
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)4867
    Reviews found online5868
  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +12
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)5872
    Reviews found online4957
  7. 61

    Handling

    Azenis FK510 +10
    71
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza S001Azenis FK510
    Reviews found online6171
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza S001 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza S001Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 63 70
Dry 72 74
Wet 75 83
Snow 51 55
Comfort 59 52
Noise 52 68
Treadwear 54 66
Handling 61 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza S001

Azenis FK510

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryPotenza S001Azenis FK510ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 96% #7/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 93% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test +2.8 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 98% #10/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test +1.0 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 89% #8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 85% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test +4.3 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 97% #7/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test +2.1 Different tests
Price Other 54% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 84% #5/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test −30.0 Different tests
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Other 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 0.0 Same test
Value Other 60% #19/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −40.3 Same test
Wear Other 85% #12/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 87% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test −1.9 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 20% #5/11 · 2014 ACE Summer Tyre Test 33% #3/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test −13.3 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 93% #3/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 95% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test −1.9 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 70% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 77% #7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test −7.1 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 90% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 73% #5/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test +16.6 Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling Subj 78% #3/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test 80% #6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test −2.0 Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Total 0% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Same test
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 91% #3/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test +9.0 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #6/8 · 2018 Auto Bild 20 inch UHP Tyre Test 99% #3/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test −4.2 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza S001

Pros

  • Precise and sharp steering response
  • Strong dry-pavement cornering grip
  • Stiff sidewalls providing robust rim protection and high-speed stability

Cons

  • High levels of road noise and cabin drone
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality (particularly noticeable on run-flat versions)
  • Poor or unpredictable wet-weather grip and sudden loss of traction
All owner themes in the Potenza S001 review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Bridgestone Potenza S001 is predominantly mixed to negative, particularly concerning the run-flat variants. Drivers frequently report stiff sidewalls, harsh ride quality, road noise, premature wear, and tread cracking, leading many to switch to non-run-flat alternatives like Michelin. However, several owners find them adequate for spirited driving, citing satisfactory dry and wet grip as well as acceptable ride comfort on specific vehicle setups.

Top themes
#run-flat stiffness and harshness#premature tread wear#tread cracking issues#wet and dry grip#switching to non-run-flats#road noise generation#OEM tire replacement

Based on 43 community posts

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/Porsche ·1 upvote ·2025-03-27

“Do you mean FK510? These are mid range UHP tyres and usually perform near the bottom when tested against other UHP tyres: Poor braking performance and oversteer balance would be my main concerns based on those test results. I wouldn't run FK510s on any of my RWD cars but if cost is your main concern then you do you.”

mustang6g.com ·2019-12-06

“I picked up a very nice used 2018 GT Premium auto in Jacksonville, NC on Tuesday. The dealership put a set of new Falken 510s on it and having had mostly Michelins, expected "blah". Not so! Drove to Charlotte and back to Oakland, MI. About 1,000 miles. Fast, slow, city, highway. The tires are very comfortable soaking holes and bumps very well. Quiet. Handle much better than I would have imagined. Providing they don't start making a lot of noises, etc, I would consider replacing them when they wear out. Tire Rack has them at $194 for the 265/35ZR20s which are the size the car came with. The Michelins were $350 each for the same size. So far the tire is a steal. So, those on a budget have an opportunity to get stellar performance for almost 1/2 the price. Impressed!”

r/TeslaModelS ·1 upvote ·2025-11-28

“2022 MS Plaid on 21" archnids. Factory Michelins replaced at 7,500 miles (at wear markers). FK510's after 9,000 miles on the rubber are at 7/32. Expecting another 5,000 miles or so. They're comparable treadwear rating but last longer. Heavy car with lots of torque will inevitably go through tires sooner than the rated mileage. I'm fortunate to have decent alignment from the factory as the wear was even. Good luck on the next set of tires.”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza S001 B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5593
Rim diameters15″ – 21″17″ – 22″
Tread depth8/32″10/32″
UTQG280 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza S001

Falken Azenis FK510

Winner: Falken Azenis FK510 — better noise, treadwear and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S001 if comfort matters most to you.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 68 vs 52 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 66 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 71 vs 61 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 75 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S001
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

70

Leads

Azenis FK510

Amazon